JOHNSON v. UPMC MCKEESPORT et al
| LAUREL JOHNSON |
| UPMC MCKEESPORT and UPMC |
| 2:2018cv01675 |
| December 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Cathy Bissoon |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Attorney James Patrick Lopez has been terminated, and attorney Kayla Drum continues to represent Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 2/14/19. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (dcd)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Substitute Attorney by LAUREL JOHNSON. (Drum, Kayla) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by LAUREL JOHNSON. UPMC MCKEESPORT waiver sent on 1/4/2018, answer due 3/5/2018. (Lopez, James) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER re Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) Motions to Dismiss, more fully stated in said order. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 12/18/18. (jhi)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UPMC, UPMC MCKEESPORT (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 0315-4968794), filed by LAUREL JOHNSON. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ept) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
