MEYER v. STOLTENBERG CONSULTING INCORPORATED et al
Plaintiff: MICHAEL I. MEYER
Defendant: TOM SCHWEITZER, STOLTENBERG CONSULTING INC., STOLTENBERG CONSULTING INCORPORATED, SHERI L. STOLTENBERG and MARK HESS
Case Number: 2:2018cv01696
Filed: December 21, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Mark R Hornak
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 15, 2019 Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint by MARK HESS, TOM SCHWEITZER, SHERI L. STOLTENBERG, STOLTENBERG CONSULTING INC., STOLTENBERG CONSULTING INCORPORATED. (Smith, Douglas)
January 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER. On or before 2/15/19, the Defendants shall file an Answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Signed by Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak on 1/29/19. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bdb)
January 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER APPROVING #11 Stipulation to Dismiss Count IV and Count V of Plaintiff's Complaint. It is hereby ORDERED that Count IV and Count V of Plaintiff's Complaint are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is further ORDERED that #5 Partial Motion to Dismiss Counts IV and V of Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS MOOT. Signed by Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak on 1/28/19. (bdb)
January 25, 2019 Filing 11 STIPULATION TO DISMISS COUNT IV AND COUNT V OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT by MICHAEL I. MEYER. (Kelley, G.)
January 18, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Jenna M. Decker on behalf of MARK HESS, TOM SCHWEITZER, SHERI L. STOLTENBERG, STOLTENBERG CONSULTING INC., STOLTENBERG CONSULTING INCORPORATED. (Decker, Jenna)
January 18, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE of Substitution of Attorney Appearance by Douglas G. Smith on behalf of MARK HESS, TOM SCHWEITZER, SHERI L. STOLTENBERG, STOLTENBERG CONSULTING INC., STOLTENBERG CONSULTING INCORPORATED. Attorney Marla N. Presley terminated. (Smith, Douglas)
January 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. On or before 1/25/19, counsel for the Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE as to why #5 Partial Motion to Dismiss should not be granted for failure to respond. Signed by Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak on 1/18/19. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bdb)
December 28, 2018 Filing 7 Disclosure Statement identifying None as corporate parent or other affiliate, by STOLTENBERG CONSULTING INC., STOLTENBERG CONSULTING INCORPORATED. (Presley, Marla)
December 28, 2018 Filing 6 BRIEF in Support re #5 Motion to Dismiss, Counts IV and V of Plaintiff's Complaint filed by MARK HESS, TOM SCHWEITZER, SHERI L. STOLTENBERG, STOLTENBERG CONSULTING INC., STOLTENBERG CONSULTING INCORPORATED. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Presley, Marla)
December 28, 2018 Filing 5 Partial MOTION to Dismiss Counts IV and V of Plaintiff's Complaint by MARK HESS, TOM SCHWEITZER, SHERI L. STOLTENBERG, STOLTENBERG CONSULTING INC., STOLTENBERG CONSULTING INCORPORATED. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Presley, Marla)
December 26, 2018 Filing 4 AT&T SCHEDULING NOTICE FOR ALL TELEPHONIC CONFERENCES. Every Telephonic Conference conducted will be via an AT&T call-in number which requires participants to dial-in and provide an access code. When a Telephonic Conference is scheduled you will be instructed to refer back to this Notice and use either Dial-In No. 1 or Dial-In No. 2, both of which are contained in this Notice. This document has a security setting of "Case Participants Only", so only those individuals will have access to view the document. (bdb)
December 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING ORDER AND PROCEDURES ON CIVIL MOTION PRACTICE. Signed by Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak on 12/26/18. (bdb)
December 26, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (bdb)
December 21, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Common Pleas of Allegheny County, case number GD 17-6360 Copies attached: Complaint (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 0315-4974410), filed by TOM SCHWEITZER, STOLTENBERG CONSULTING INCORPORATED, SHERI L. STOLTENBERG, MARK HESS, STOLTENBERG CONSULTING INC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (ept)
December 21, 2018 CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #1 Notice of Removal. ERROR: Party did not file disclosure statement as required pursuant to L.R. 7.1.1. CORRECTION: Attorney advised to file statement within 7 days. This message is for informational purposes only. Disclosure Statement due by 12/28/2018. (ept)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MEYER v. STOLTENBERG CONSULTING INCORPORATED et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TOM SCHWEITZER
Represented By: Marla N. Presley
Represented By: Douglas G. Smith
Represented By: Jenna M. Decker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STOLTENBERG CONSULTING INC.
Represented By: Marla N. Presley
Represented By: Douglas G. Smith
Represented By: Jenna M. Decker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STOLTENBERG CONSULTING INCORPORATED
Represented By: Marla N. Presley
Represented By: Douglas G. Smith
Represented By: Jenna M. Decker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SHERI L. STOLTENBERG
Represented By: Marla N. Presley
Represented By: Douglas G. Smith
Represented By: Jenna M. Decker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MARK HESS
Represented By: Marla N. Presley
Represented By: Douglas G. Smith
Represented By: Jenna M. Decker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MICHAEL I. MEYER
Represented By: G. Clinton Kelley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?