SMITH v. ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
Plaintiff: RALPH SMITH
Defendant: ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and STROM ENGINEERING CORPORATION
Case Number: 2:2019cv00147
Filed: February 8, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Patricia L Dodge
Referring Judge: Mark R Hornak
2 Judge: Robert C Mitchell
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 14, 2019 Filing 19 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM or to Strike filed by STROM ENGINEERING CORPORATION. Objections to R&R due by 11/29/2019 Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Dodge on 11/14/2019. (mqe)
June 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Dodge for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Robert C. Mitchell no longer assigned to case. Motions referred to Patricia L. Dodge. All previously scheduled deadlines and proceedings shall remain in effect unless otherwise ordered by the Court. See order at 2:19-mc-711. Signed by Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak on 6/6/2019. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (admin1, )
April 17, 2019 Filing 17 Errata re #16 Reply to Response to Motion by STROM ENGINEERING CORPORATION. Reason for Correction: Signature does not match filer. (Schroeder, Theodore)
April 17, 2019 CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #16 Reply in Support of Motion. ERROR: Signature on document and filer do not match. CORRECTION: Attorney Vaughn advised of signature requirements. Attorney Schroeder to resubmit the document using the Errata event. This message is for informational purposes only. (ksa)
April 16, 2019 Filing 16 REPLY in Support re #9 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, filed by STROM ENGINEERING CORPORATION. (Vaughn, Joshua) Modified text on 4/17/2019. (ksa)
April 9, 2019 Filing 15 BRIEF in Opposition re #9 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant Strom Engineering Corporation's Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative to Strike, Plaintiff's Amended Complaint filed by RALPH SMITH. (Schalman-Bergen, Sarah)
March 19, 2019 Filing 14 Disclosure Statement identifying None as corporate parent or other affiliate, by STROM ENGINEERING CORPORATION. (Schroeder, Theodore)
March 19, 2019 Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Katelyn W. McCombs on behalf of STROM ENGINEERING CORPORATION. (McCombs, Katelyn)
March 19, 2019 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Joshua Vaughn on behalf of STROM ENGINEERING CORPORATION. (Vaughn, Joshua)
March 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER Response/Briefing Schedule re #9 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim: Brief in Opposition due by 4/9/2019. Replies due by 4/16/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert C. Mitchell on 3/19/2019. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (spc)
March 19, 2019 CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #9 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. ERROR: MULTIPLE Relief Motion Filed as One Relief. CORRECTION: Attorney Schroeder advised in future that Motions of this nature are to be filed using the Motion Event and clicking on all the reliefs sought in said motion. Clerk of Court added/docketed Motion to Strike Amended Complaint. This message is for informational purposes only. (ksa)
March 18, 2019 MOTION to Strike #4 Amended Complaint by STROM ENGINEERING CORPORATION. Motion referred to Robert C. Mitchell. (Filed with document #9 ) (ksa)
March 18, 2019 Filing 10 BRIEF in Support re #9 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by STROM ENGINEERING CORPORATION. (Schroeder, Theodore)
March 18, 2019 Filing 9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM or to Strike by STROM ENGINEERING CORPORATION. Motion(s) referred to Robert C. Mitchell. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Schroeder, Theodore) ERROR: MULTIPLE RELIEF DOCUMENT FILED AS ONE RELIEF; RE-FILED BY COURT. (ksa)
March 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER. Based on counsel's telephonic communication with Chambers, it is hereby ORDERED that 7 Order to Show Cause is hereby VACATED. STROM ENGINEERING CORPORATION shall file its answer on or before 3/18/19. Signed by Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak on 3/15/19. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bdb)
March 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Within (7) days of the date of this Order, it is hereby ORDERED that counsel for the Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE as to why this action should not be dismissed as to Defendant Strom Engineering Corporation only for want of prosecution. Signed by Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak on 3/14/19. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bdb)
February 25, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Shanon J. Carson on behalf of RALPH SMITH. (Carson, Shanon)
February 25, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Alexandra Koropey Piazza on behalf of RALPH SMITH. (Piazza, Alexandra)
February 25, 2019 Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against STROM ENGINEERING CORPORATION STROM ENGINEERING CORPORATION answer due 3/11/2019, filed by RALPH SMITH. (Schalman-Bergen, Sarah)
February 25, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah R. Schalman-Bergen on behalf of RALPH SMITH. (Schalman-Bergen, Sarah)
February 14, 2019 Magistrate Judge Robert C. Mitchell referred. (nll)
February 8, 2019 Filing 2 Disclosure Statement identifying None as corporate parent or other affiliate, by ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (ksa)
February 8, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Allegheny County, case number GD 19-001929 Copies attached: Complaint and Docket Sheet from Allegheny County (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 0315-5023013), filed by ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Notice of Related Case) (ksa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SMITH v. ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Represented By: David J. Kolesar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STROM ENGINEERING CORPORATION
Represented By: Joshua Vaughn
Represented By: Theodore A. Schroeder
Represented By: Katelyn W. McCombs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RALPH SMITH
Represented By: Joseph H. Chivers
Represented By: Shanon J. Carson
Represented By: Sarah R. Schalman-Bergen
Represented By: Alexandra Koropey Piazza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?