BERTA v. IGNATENKO
| YVONNE C. BERTA |
| VALERIE IGNATENKO |
| 2:2019cv00570 |
| May 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Joy Flowers Conti |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Halesey, Christopher) |
Filing 7
INITIAL LOCAL RULE 16.1 SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26 Meeting Report and Stipulation Selecting ADR Process due by 7/11/2019. Case Management set for 7/17/2019 at 02:45 PM in Courtroom 5A before Judge Joy Flowers Conti. All counsel and unrepresented parties shall bring their calendars to the conference for scheduling purposes. The parties should be prepared to discuss settlement, the designation of an Alternative Dispute Resolution process and any other matter that will contribute to the prompt disposition of the case. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 6/6/2019. (smc)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER ON MOTION PRACTICE. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 6/6/2019. (smc)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (smc) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Substitution of Attorney Appearance by Francis D. Wymard on behalf of VALERIE IGNATENKO. Attorney Elizabeth Farina Collura terminated. (Wymard, Francis) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Substitution of Attorney Appearance by Christopher M. Halesey on behalf of YVONNE C. BERTA. Attorney Robert B. Woomer terminated. (Halesey, Christopher) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by VALERIE IGNATENKO. (Collura, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from The Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, case number GD-19-004483 with Jury Demand (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 0315-5137238) filed by VALERIE IGNATENKO. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C) (cel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: BERTA v. IGNATENKO | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: YVONNE C. BERTA | |
| Represented By: | Robert B. Woomer |
| Represented By: | Christopher M. Halesey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: VALERIE IGNATENKO | |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth F. Collura |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth Farina Collura |
| Represented By: | Francis D. Wymard |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
