KERR v. INDEPENDENT EQUIPMENT TRANSFER CO., INC. et al
TERESA KERR |
INDEPENDENT EQUIPMENT TRANSFER CO., INC. and WILLIAM T. ADAMS |
2:2019cv00654 |
June 5, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Mark R Hornak |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed on 6/11/19 by TERESA KERR. All Defendants. Answer due 8/12/19. (Muscato, George) Modified text on 7/10/2019 to add dates. (av) |
Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by WILLIAM T. ADAMS, INDEPENDENT EQUIPMENT TRANSFER CO., INC. WILLIAM T. ADAMS waiver sent on 6/11/2019, answer due 8/12/2019; INDEPENDENT EQUIPMENT TRANSFER CO., INC. waiver sent on 6/11/2019, answer due 8/12/2019. (Newberry, Darren) |
CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #10 Waiver of Service Executed. ERROR: No proof of service identified by date. CORRECTION: Attorney is to file an ERRATA identifying 6/11/2019 as the date of service. Attorney advised to link ERRATA event to #10 Waiver of Serivice executed. This message is for informational purposes only. (jv) |
Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by WILLIAM T. ADAMS, INDEPENDENT EQUIPMENT TRANSFER CO., INC. (Newberry, Darren) |
CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #9 Waiver of Service Executed. ERROR: Date of execution not indicated on document. When refiling a Waiver of Service Returned Executed, use event correctly to generate answer due date. (av) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas P. Birris on behalf of WILLIAM T. ADAMS, INDEPENDENT EQUIPMENT TRANSFER CO., INC.. (Birris, Thomas) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Darren M. Newberry on behalf of WILLIAM T. ADAMS, INDEPENDENT EQUIPMENT TRANSFER CO., INC. (Newberry, Darren) |
Filing 6 ORDER GRANTING #5 Motion for George V.C. Muscato to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak on 6/10/19. (bdb) |
Filing 5 MOTION for attorney GEORGE V.C. MUSCATO to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # 0315-5164764) by TERESA KERR. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit Cert of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order) (Muscato, George) |
Filing 4 AT&T SCHEDULING NOTICE FOR ALL TELEPHONIC CONFERENCES. Every Telephonic Conference conducted will be via an AT&T call-in number which requires participants to dial-in and provide an access code. When a Telephonic Conference is scheduled you will be instructed to refer back to this Notice and use either Dial-In No. 1 or Dial-In No. 2, both of which are contained in this Notice. This document has a security setting of "Case Participants Only", so only those individuals will have access to view the document. (bdb) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER AND PROCEDURES ON CIVIL MOTION PRACTICE. Signed by Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak on 6/7/19. (bdb) |
Filing 2 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (bdb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against WILLIAM T. ADAMS, INDEPENDENT EQUIPMENT TRANSFER CO., INC. (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 0315-5162247) filed by TERESA KERR. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (cel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.