WRIGHT v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
| KEITH WRIGHT |
| COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, WARDEN, SCI COAL TOWNSHIP and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY |
| 2:2019cv00844 |
| July 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Cynthia Reed Eddy |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA served on 8/29/2019, answer due 9/19/2019; DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY served on 8/29/2019, answer due 9/19/2019; WARDEN, SCI COAL TOWNSHIP served on 8/30/2019, answer due 9/20/2019. (cjo) |
Filing 6
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the United States Marshal shall make service of this order, together with a copy of the Petition upon the Respondents. Service shall be by certified mail, with costs to be advanced by the United States. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within twenty-one (21) days of service of this Order, the District Attorney of Allegheny County shall respond to the Petition on behalf of all Respondents. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 8/23/2019. (sms)
|
| Filing 5 TEXT ORDER - The Clerk of Court is ORDERED to add Warden, SCI Coal Township, as a respondent because a prisoner's custodian is the proper respondent in a habeas corpus case, Rumsfield v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 434-35 (2004), and to add the District Attorney of Allegheny County as a respondent pursuant to Local Rule 2254(b). Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 8/22/2019. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bsc) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope) (ept) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/8/2019: #3 Exhibit) (sms) Modified text to change description of document on 8/8/2019. (bsc) |
| Filing 3 COPYRIGHT DOCUMENTS ISSUED. Emailed copy of Transmittal Letter, AO 121 Form, Complaint, Exhibits and Docket Sheet to the Register of Copyrights. (jv) |
| CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #3 Copyright Documents - Complaint. ERROR: Document filed in wrong case. CORRECTION: Removed from public view. This message is for informational purposes only. (jv) |
| Filing 2 TEXT ORDER - The Petition as submitted was not prepared on the Court-approved standard form and does not substantially comply with Federal 2254 Rule 2, as supplemented by this Court's Local Rules. The Court has accepted and filed the insufficient petition for the sole purpose of preserving the timeliness. Petitioner is being provided a standard form on which he must provide answers to every question. The amended petition must be filed by August 30, 2019. This case shall be placed in administrative suspense pending receipt of the amended petition, at which time the case will be reopened. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 7/26/2019. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bsc) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5, receipt number 24668057343), filed by KEITH WRIGHT. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit B2, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit E2, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit F2, #10 Receipt, #11 Envelope) (av) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
