PARKER v. BAKER et al
| JEROME WAYNE PARKER |
| KAYLEE BOYKIN, ANGELA WILSON and BILL JOHN BAKER |
| 2:2019cv01439 |
| November 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| J Nicholas Ranjan |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the complaint is dismissed under 28 U.S.C. 1915. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED. Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 11/25/2019. (av)
|
| Filing 3 MEMORANDUM OPINION re #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by JEROME WAYNE PARKER. Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 11/25/2019. (av) |
| Filing 2 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by JEROME WAYNE PARKER. (jd) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by JEROME WAYNE PARKER. (Attachments: #1 COMPLAINT LODGED PENDING RULING ON IFP, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Exhibit, #13 Exhibit, #14 Exhibit, #15 Exhibit, #16 Exhibit, #17 Exhibit, #18 Exhibit, #19 Exhibit, #20 Exhibit, #21 Envelope, #22 Civil Cover Sheet) (jd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
