HEASTER v. EQT CORPORATION
ADAM HEASTER |
EQT CORPORATION |
2:2019cv01463 |
November 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Maureen P Kelly |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 216 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 MOTION for attorney Taylor A. Jones to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # 0315-5416405) by ADAM HEASTER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Affidavit, #2 Exhibit B - Cert of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order) (Jones, Taylor) |
Filing 13 ORDER: Rule 26 Meeting to be conducted on or before 1/7/2020. Rule 26 Meeting Report and either the Stipulation Selecting ADR Process or the Expedited Docket Stipulation due by 1/14/2020. Initial Case Management set for 1/21/2020 at 01:30 PM in Suite 9280 before Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 12/19/2019. (tjw) |
Filing 12 Disclosure Statement identifying EQT Production Company as corporate parent or other affiliate, by EQT CORPORATION. (Antkowiak, Christian) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by EQT CORPORATION. (Antkowiak, Christian) |
Update Answer Deadline: Answer due from EQT CORPORATION on 12/18/2019 (nll) |
Filing 10 As detailed in the accompanying Order, given that motions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) are discouraged if the pleading defect is curable by amendment, IT HEREBY IS ORDERED that the parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of any motion to dismiss to determine whether it can be avoided. The duty to meet and confer extends to parties appearing pro se. Consistent with the foregoing, motions to dismiss must be accompanied by a certificate of the movant, stating that the moving party has made a good faith effort to confer with the nonmovant(s) to determine whether the identified pleading deficiencies properly may be cured by amendment. Motions to dismiss that do not contain the required certification will be summarily denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 12/03/2019. (tjw) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Christian Antkowiak on behalf of EQT CORPORATION. (Antkowiak, Christian) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Curtis M. Schaffner on behalf of EQT CORPORATION. (Schaffner, Curtis) |
Filing 7 STIPULATION For Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Collective Action Complaint by EQT CORPORATION. (Schaffner, Curtis) |
CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #6 Notice of Appearance. ERROR: Party did not file disclosure statement as required pursuant L.R. 7.1.1. CORRECTION: Attorney advised to file statement within 7 days. Disclosure Statement due by 12/6/2019. (mao) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicholas J. Bell on behalf of EQT CORPORATION. (Bell, Nicholas) |
Update Answer Deadline: Answer due from EQT CORPORATION on 12/4/2019 (mao) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Joshua P. Geist on behalf of ADAM HEASTER. (Geist, Joshua) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by ADAM HEASTER. EQT CORPORATION served on 11/13/2019, answer due 12/4/2019. (Dunlap, Andrew) Modified text on 11/25/2019 to correct party name. (mao) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael A. Josephson on behalf of ADAM HEASTER. (Josephson, Michael) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to EQT CORPORATION (mao) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against EQT CORPORATION (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 0315-5354911), filed by ADAM HEASTER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons) (mao) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.