GSELL v. STARLINE HOLDINGS, LLC
| DEREK S. GSELL |
| STARLINE HOLDINGS, LLC |
| 2:2019cv01486 |
| November 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Cathy Bissoon |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Errata re 8 Order, Set Hearings Reason for Correction: Wrong Document Attached. (jhi) |
Filing 9
ORDER. All counsel of record in this case must read the attached article on mediation prior to the initial Case Management Conference, and share the same with their client(s). The attached article is being disseminated with permission of the author and The Pennsylvania Lawyer. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 1/10/20. (Attachments: #1 (Exhibit, Article re Mediation) (jhi)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Christopher S. Mayer to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 12/17/2019. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (scl)
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by STARLINE HOLDINGS, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (Wapner, Matthew) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for attorney Christopher S. Mayer to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # 0315-5375537) by STARLINE HOLDINGS, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Christopher S. Mayer, Esq., #2 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order, #4 Certificate of Service) (Mayer, Christopher) |
| Filing 4 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Answer by STARLINE HOLDINGS, LLC Answer due from STARLINE HOLDINGS, LLC on 12/5/2019. (Wapner, Matthew) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER re Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) Motions to Dismiss, more fully stated in said order. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 11/18/19. (jhi)
|
| Filing 2 Disclosure Statement identifying Legrand Holding, Inc. and Legrand as corporate parent or other affiliate, by STARLINE HOLDINGS, LLC. (jm) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, case number GD-19-014418 with Jury Demand Copies attached: Complaint, Declaration, Certificate of Service (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 0315-5360778), filed by STARLINE HOLDINGS, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Declaration, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Certificate of Service) (jm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: GSELL v. STARLINE HOLDINGS, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DEREK S. GSELL | |
| Represented By: | Christine T. Elzer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: STARLINE HOLDINGS, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Matthew G. Wapner |
| Represented By: | Christopher S. Mayer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
