HODGES v. U.S. POST OFFICE
| SCOTT HODGES |
| U.S. POST OFFICE |
| 2:2019cv01501 |
| November 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Nora Barry Fischer |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER Response/Briefing Schedule re #7 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Brief #8 : Pro Se Plaintiff's Response to said Motion and Brief is due by 2/3/20. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 1/13/20. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (jg)
|
| Filing 8 BRIEF in Support re #7 Motion to Dismiss filed by U.S. POST OFFICE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (Taylor, Kezia) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint re #6 Supplement by U.S. POST OFFICE. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Taylor, Kezia) |
| Filing 6 DETAILS RELATED TO PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM by SCOTT HODGES. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Envelope) (jjg) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer by U.S. POST OFFICE; U.S. POST OFFICE's answer is now due 1/13/2020. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 11/21/2019. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter.(bdk)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by U.S. POST OFFICE by U.S. POST OFFICE. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Taylor, Kezia) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER RE: Rule 12(b) Motions (details more fully stated in said Order). Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 11/20/19. (jg)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (jg) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Washington County Magisterial District Court 27-2-01, case number MJ-27201-CV-0000281-2019. Copies attached: Complaint, filed by U.S. POST OFFICE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (jjg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: HODGES v. U.S. POST OFFICE | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: U.S. POST OFFICE | |
| Represented By: | Kezia Taylor |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: SCOTT HODGES | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
