DUKE v. HARVEST HOSPITALITIES, INC. et al
| TAYLOR DUKE |
| SATTAR SHAIK and HARVEST HOSPITALITIES, INC. |
| 2:2020cv00865 |
| June 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| J Nicholas Ranjan |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by HARVEST HOSPITALITIES, INC., SATTAR SHAIK. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (Shafkowitz, David)
|
|
Filing 13
CONSENT TO OPT IN as a class member by Daryl Beck. (Chivers, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 12
CONSENT TO OPT IN as a class member by Taylor Duke. (Chivers, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 11
Stipulation for Extension of Time to Answer by SATTAR SHAIK, HARVEST HOSPITALITIES, INC. Answer due from All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (Shafkowitz, David)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Motion for David M. Shafkowitz to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 7/9/2020. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (av)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION for attorney David M. Shafkowitz to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # APAWDC-5745081) by HARVEST HOSPITALITIES, INC., SATTAR SHAIK. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C) (Shafkowitz, David)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDERED that the #7 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to refile with appropriate certificate of good standing. Per Local Rule 83.2(B), an affiant seeking pro hac vice admission with this Court shall attach to the affidavit one current certificate of good standing from the bar or the court in which the affiant primarily practices. Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 7/8/2020. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (av)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for attorney David M. Shafkowitz to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # APAWDC-5741118) by HARVEST HOSPITALITIES, INC., SATTAR SHAIK. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Proposed Order) (Shafkowitz, David)
|
|
Filing 6
Proposed Rule 26(f) report (av)
|
|
Filing 5
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/25/2020 at 01:00 PM in Courtroom 6C before Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan. Exchange of required Rule 26(a)(1) information due by 8/14/2020; Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 8/14/2020; Stipulation Selecting ADR process due by 8/14/2020. Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 6/30/2020. (av)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by TAYLOR DUKE. SATTAR SHAIK served on 6/19/2020, answer due 7/10/2020. (Chivers, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 3
SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by TAYLOR DUKE. HARVEST HOSPITALITIES, INC. served on 6/19/2020, answer due 7/10/2020. (Chivers, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued as to HARVEST HOSPITALITIES, INC., SATTAR SHAIK (Attachments: #1 Summons Shaik) (ept)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against HARVEST HOSPITALITIES, INC., SATTAR SHAIK (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number APAWDC-5683069), filed by TAYLOR DUKE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Harvest Hospitalities, #3 Summons Shaik) (ept)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
