PLAZA POINTE, LLC v. MATTRESS FIRM, INC.
Plaintiff: PLAZA POINTE, LLC
Defendant: MATTRESS FIRM, INC.
Case Number: 2:2020cv01358
Filed: September 10, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: W Scott Hardy
Nature of Suit: Rent Lease & Ejectment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER indicating that a Telephonic Status Conference is set for 12/8/2020 10:30 AM before Judge W. Scott Hardy. Signed by Judge W. Scott Hardy on 11/5/20. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (kas)
November 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. The Honorable Gary Caruso is appointed as mediator. The ADR conference(s) shall be concluded before 1/4/21 unless extended by order of the Court. Attorney Yarbrough is designated at lead ADR Counsel and shall file a notice concerning the ADR session as more specifically set forth in the the Court's order by 12/20/20. Signed by Judge W. Scott Hardy on 11/5/20. (kas)
November 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Initial Disclosures due by 11/30/2020; Amended Pleadings/Parties due by 12/4/2020; Fact Discovery ends 4/5/2021. The parties shall complete the ADR process they selected by 1/4/21. A Telephonic Post-Discovery Status Conference set for 4/13/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge W. Scott Hardy. Signed by Judge W. Scott Hardy on 11/5/20. (kas)
November 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER entered pursuant to Rule 502(d) of the Federal Rules of Evidence. Signed by Judge W. Scott Hardy on 11/5/20. (kas)
November 5, 2020 Filing 11 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge W. Scott Hardy: Telephonic Initial Case Management Conference held on 11/5/2020. Appropriate orders to follow. (Court Reporter: None) (kas)
October 29, 2020 Filing 10 STIPULATION selecting ADR process by MATTRESS FIRM, INC.. (Conley, John)
October 29, 2020 Filing 9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Conley, John)
October 26, 2020 Filing 8 Disclosure Statement identifying None as corporate parent or other affiliate, by PLAZA POINTE, LLC. (Yarbrough, Jason)
October 21, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Kate E. McCarthy on behalf of PLAZA POINTE, LLC. (McCarthy, Kate)
October 20, 2020 Filing 6 AT&T SCHEDULING NOTICE FOR ALL TELEPHONIC CONFERENCES. Every Telephonic Conference conducted will be via an AT&T call-in number which requires participants to dial-in and provide an access code. When a Telephonic Conference is scheduled you will be instructed to refer back to this document. This document has a security setting of "Case Participants Only," so only those individuals will have access to view the document. (dms)
October 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 INITIAL LOCAL RULE 16.1 SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Conference set for 11/5/2020 at 10:00 AM by Telephone Conference before Judge W. Scott Hardy. Rule 26 Meeting Report and ADR Stipulation due by 10/29/2020 as more fully stated in the attached order. Signed by Judge W. Scott Hardy on 10/7/2020. (kas)
October 2, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (dms)
September 28, 2020 Filing 3 Disclosure Statement identifying Steinhoff International Holdings N.V. as corporate parent or other affiliate, by MATTRESS FIRM, INC. (Conley, John) Modified on 10/7/2020 (ma).
September 18, 2020 CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #2 Answer to Complaint. ERROR: Party did not file disclosure statement as required pursuant L.R. 7.1.1. CORRECTION: Attorney advised to file statement within 7 days. This message is for informational purposes only. Disclosure Statement due by 9/25/2020. (jjg)
September 17, 2020 Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint by MATTRESS FIRM, INC. (Conley, John) Modified on 9/18/2020 (jjg).
September 10, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, case number GD-20-008406 Copies attached: State Court Complaint, Entry of Appearance, Affidavit of Service (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number APAWDC-5901389), filed by MATTRESS FIRM, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (ma)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PLAZA POINTE, LLC v. MATTRESS FIRM, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MATTRESS FIRM, INC.
Represented By: John R Conley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PLAZA POINTE, LLC
Represented By: Brandon B. Rothey
Represented By: Jason M. Yarbrough
Represented By: Kate E. McCarthy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?