ERDMAN v. HQ RESOURCES, INC.
TRUDY ERDMAN |
HQ RESOURCES, INC. |
2:2020cv01366 |
September 11, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
W Scott Hardy |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 216 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 CLERK'S ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to HQ RESOURCES, INC. (lar) |
Filing 9 AT&T SCHEDULING NOTICE FOR ALL TELEPHONIC CONFERENCES. Every Telephonic Conference conducted will be via an AT&T call-in number which requires participants to dial-in and provide an access code. When a Telephonic Conference is scheduled you will be instructed to refer back to this document. This document has a security setting of "Case Participants Only," so only those individuals will have access to view the document. (dms) |
Filing 8 REQUEST by TRUDY ERDMAN for entry of DEFAULT against HQ RESOURCES, INC. . (Murthy, Angeli) |
CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #6 Motion for Default. ERROR: Wrong event selected. CORRECTION: This needs to be re-filed as a Request for Entry of Default. Please retitle the document as a Request for Entry of Default. Attorney to use the event "Request for Entry of Default" to file the document. (lar) |
Filing 7 Errata re #6 Motion for Default by TRUDY ERDMAN. Reason for Correction: Plaintiff indavertently selected filing against Trudy Erdman, when in fact the docket text should read, Motion for Default against HQ RESOURCES, INC. by TRUDY ERDMAN. (Murthy, Angeli) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Default against TRUDY ERDMAN by TRUDY ERDMAN. (Murthy, Angeli) |
Filing 5 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (dms) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by TRUDY ERDMAN. HQ RESOURCES, INC. served on 9/26/2020, answer due 10/19/2020. (Murthy, Angeli) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Consent Filing as to TRUDY ERDMAN by TRUDY ERDMAN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "A"- Consent to Join of Trudy Erdman) (Murthy, Angeli) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to HQ RESOURCES, INC. (jjg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against HQ RESOURCES, INC. (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number APAWDC-5903060), filed by TRUDY ERDMAN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jjg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: ERDMAN v. HQ RESOURCES, INC. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: TRUDY ERDMAN | |
Represented By: | Angeli Murthy |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: HQ RESOURCES, INC. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.