RUPP v. MARYLAND OVERPAK CORPORATION
TODD RUPP |
MARYLAND OVERPAK CORPORATION |
2:2020cv01392 |
September 15, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
J Nicholas Ranjan |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER striking #13 Stipulation Selecting ADR process. The parties must file an amended ADR Stipulation by 11/13/2020 that includes a set date for the mediation and a representative for defendant. Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 11/9/2020. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (av) |
Filing 13 STIPULATION selecting ADR process by TODD RUPP. (Elliott, Ronald) |
Filing 12 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Elliott, Ronald) |
Filing 11 Disclosure Statement identifying None as corporate parent or other affiliate, by MARYLAND OVERPAK CORPORATION. (Sneath, Henry) |
CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #10 Answer to Complaint. ERROR: Party did not file disclosure statement as required pursuant L.R. 7.1.1. CORRECTION: Attorney advised to file statement within 7 days. This message is for informational purposes only. Disclosure Statement due by 10/22/2020. (sdp) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint and Defenses by MARYLAND OVERPAK CORPORATION. (Sneath, Henry) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert D. Shope, Jr on behalf of MARYLAND OVERPAK CORPORATION. (Shope, Robert) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Henry M. Sneath on behalf of MARYLAND OVERPAK CORPORATION. (Sneath, Henry) |
Filing 7 Proposed Rule 26(f) report (av) |
Filing 5 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Telephonic Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/18/2020 at 03:00 PM before Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 11/6/2020. Stipulation Selecting ADR Process due by 11/6/2020. Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 9/28/2020. (av) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by TODD RUPP. MARYLAND OVERPAK CORPORATION served on 9/23/2020, answer due 10/14/2020. (Elliott, Ronald) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to MARYLAND OVERPAK CORPORATION (sdp) |
Filing 2 PRAECIPE to Issue Summons by TODD RUPP (Elliott, Ronald) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MARYLAND OVERPAK CORPORATION (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number APAWDC-591343), filed by TODD RUPP. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (sdp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: RUPP v. MARYLAND OVERPAK CORPORATION | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: TODD RUPP | |
Represented By: | Ronald T. Elliott |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: MARYLAND OVERPAK CORPORATION | |
Represented By: | Robert D. Shope, Jr. |
Represented By: | Henry M. Sneath |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.