PASHUTA v. COMMAND SECURITY CORPORATION
LISA PASHUTA |
COMMAND SECURITY CORPORATION |
2:2020cv01623 |
October 26, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Maureen P Kelly |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Stephanie J. Peet to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 11/30/2020. (et) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Michael D. Ridenour to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 11/30/2020. (et) |
Filing 5 MOTION for attorney Stephanie J. Peet to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # APAWDC-6114502) by COMMAND SECURITY CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Certificate of Service, #3 Proposed Order) (Peet, Stephanie) |
Filing 4 MOTION for attorney Michael D. Ridenour to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # APAWDC-6113677) by COMMAND SECURITY CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Certificate of Service, #3 Proposed Order) (Ridenour, Michael) |
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by LISA PASHUTA. COMMAND SECURITY CORPORATION waiver sent on 11/4/2020, answer due 1/4/2021. (Koller, David) |
Filing 2 As detailed in the accompanying Order, given that motions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) are discouraged if the pleading defect is curable by amendment, IT HEREBY IS ORDERED that the parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of any motion to dismiss to determine whether it can be avoided. The duty to meet and confer extends to parties appearing pro se. Consistent with the foregoing, motions to dismiss must be accompanied by a certificate of the movant, stating that the moving party has made a good faith effort to confer with the nonmovant(s) to determine whether the identified pleading deficiencies properly may be cured by amendment. Motions to dismiss that do not contain the required certification will be summarily denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 10/27/2020. (ndf) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against COMMAND SECURITY CORPORATION (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number CPAWDC-6029869), filed by LISA PASHUTA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jv) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: PASHUTA v. COMMAND SECURITY CORPORATION | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: COMMAND SECURITY CORPORATION | |
Represented By: | Michael Ridenour |
Represented By: | Stephanie J. Peet |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: LISA PASHUTA | |
Represented By: | David M. Koller |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.