ANDRES v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
MARK ANDRES |
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF) |
2:2020cv01649 |
October 29, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Donetta W Ambrose |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by MARK ANDRES. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY served on 11/6/2020, answer due 1/5/2021. (Barrett, Mark) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY (jd) |
Filing 4 COMPLAINT against COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ), filed by MARK ANDRES. (jd) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Donetta W. Ambrose on 11/2/20. (cha) |
Filing 2 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Donetta W. Ambrose for all further proceedings. Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak on 10/30/20. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (jad) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by MARK ANDRES. (Attachments: #1 Complaint/Habeas Petition lodged pending disposition of IFP Motion, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Order, #4 Proposed Summons) (jd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.