SOLLAZZO v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
ALBERT J. SOLLAZZO |
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY |
2:2020cv01902 |
December 8, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Mark R Hornak |
Federal Employer's Liability |
28:1331 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Ponzo, Aaron) |
Filing 18 STIPULATION selecting ADR process by NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY. (Ponzo, Aaron) |
Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Aaron M. Ponzo on behalf of NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY. (Ponzo, Aaron) |
![]() |
![]() |
CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #14 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, #13 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. ERROR: the person wanting admission should filed the motion. CORRECTION: using the eratta event, refile the motions with the signature of attorney to be admitted. This message is for informational purposes only. (sdp) |
Filing 14 MOTION for attorney P. Matthew Darby to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # APAWDC-6239389) by ALBERT J. SOLLAZZO. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Affidavit, #3 Proposed Order) (Lewis, Justin) |
Filing 13 MOTION for attorney H. David Leibensperger to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # BPAWDC-6239351) by ALBERT J. SOLLAZZO. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Affidavit, #3 Proposed Order) (Lewis, Justin) |
![]() |
Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY. (Clements, Scott) |
Filing 10 Disclosure Statement identifying Norfolk Southern Corporation as corporate parent or other affiliate, by NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY. (Clements, Scott) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by ALBERT J. SOLLAZZO. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY served on 12/15/2020, answer due 1/5/2021. (Lewis, Justin) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by J. Lawson Johnston on behalf of NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY. (Johnston, J.) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Scott D. Clements on behalf of NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY. (Clements, Scott) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY (sdp) |
Filing 5 PRAECIPE to Issue Summons by ALBERT J. SOLLAZZO (Attachments: #1 Summons) (Lewis, Justin) |
Filing 4 AT&T SCHEDULING NOTICE FOR ALL TELEPHONIC CONFERENCES. Every Telephonic Conference conducted will be via an AT&T call-in number which requires participants to dial-in and provide an access code. When a Telephonic Conference is scheduled you will be instructed to refer back to this Notice and use either Dial-In No. 1 or Dial-In No. 2, both of which are contained in this Notice. This document has a security setting of "Case Participants Only", so only those individuals will have access to view the document. (jad) |
![]() |
Filing 2 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (jad) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-6123619), filed by ALBERT J. SOLLAZZO. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (sdp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.