APPLEGATE v. BUCKEYE PARTNERS, L.P.
| WAYNE APPLEGATE |
| BUCKEYE PARTNERS, L.P. |
| 2:2021cv00791 |
| June 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Mark R Hornak |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 216 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 23
ORDER. It is hereby ORDERED that within twenty-one (21) days of this date of this Order, counsel shall confer and submit to the Court the following documents: (a) A written report required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f), in the format set forth in Appendix LCvR 16.1 A (current form) to the Local Rule 16.1.1B; and, (b) A stipulation selecting an ADR process (pursuant to Local Rule 16.2) (current form). Signed by Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak on 8/11/21. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (jad)
|
| Filing 22 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by BUCKEYE PARTNERS, L.P.. (Tennant, Emma) |
|
Filing 21
ORDER DISMISSING #9 Motion to Dismiss. Based on #20 Amended Complaint, said motion is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS MOOT. Signed by Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak on 7/28/21. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bdb)
|
| Update Answer Deadline: Answer due from BUCKEYE PARTNERS, L.P. on 8/10/2021 (jjg) |
| Filing 20 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against BUCKEYE PARTNERS, L.P. BUCKEYE PARTNERS, L.P. answer due 8/10/2021, filed by WAYNE APPLEGATE. (Dunlap, Andrew) Modified text on 7/28/2021. (jjg) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER GRANTING #17 Motion for Carol A. Fitz to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak on 7/15/21. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bdb)
|
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark D. Shepard on behalf of BUCKEYE PARTNERS, L.P.. (Shepard, Mark) |
| Filing 17 MOTION for attorney Carl A Fitz to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # BPAWDC-6609373) by WAYNE APPLEGATE. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Proposed Order) (Fitz, Carl) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew W. Dunlap on behalf of WAYNE APPLEGATE. (Dunlap, Andrew) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by William F. Goodrich on behalf of WAYNE APPLEGATE. (Goodrich, William) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Joshua P. Geist on behalf of WAYNE APPLEGATE. (Geist, Joshua) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER GRANTING #8 Motion for Jon Alexander Bluebond to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak on 7/14/21. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bdb)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTING #7 Motion for Emily Philadelphia Tennant to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak on 7/14/21. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bdb)
|
| Filing 11 Disclosure Statement identifying Buckeye Partners, L.P. as corporate parent or other affiliate, by BUCKEYE PARTNERS, L.P.. (Meacham, Molly) |
| Filing 10 BRIEF in Support re #9 Motion to Dismiss filed by BUCKEYE PARTNERS, L.P.. (Meacham, Molly) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss re #1 Complaint by BUCKEYE PARTNERS, L.P.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Meacham, Molly) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for attorney Jon Alexander Bluebond to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # APAWDC-6606228) by BUCKEYE PARTNERS, L.P.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order) (Bluebond, Jon) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for attorney Emma Philadelphia Tennant to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # APAWDC-6606209) by BUCKEYE PARTNERS, L.P.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order) (Tennant, Emma) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by WAYNE APPLEGATE. BUCKEYE PARTNERS, L.P. served on 6/22/2021, answer due 7/13/2021. (Josephson, Michael) |
| Filing 5 AT&T SCHEDULING NOTICE FOR ALL TELEPHONIC CONFERENCES. Every Telephonic Conference conducted will be via an AT&T call-in number which requires participants to dial-in and provide an access code. When a Telephonic Conference is scheduled you will be instructed to refer back to this Notice and use either Dial-In No. 1 or Dial-In No. 2, both of which are contained in this Notice. This document has a security setting of "Case Participants Only", so only those individuals will have access to view the document. (bdb) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER AND PROCEDURES ON CIVIL MOTION PRACTICE. Signed by Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak on 6/21/21. (bdb)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (bdb) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to BUCKEYE PARTNERS, L.P. (jjg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BUCKEYE PARTNERS, L.P. (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-6566995), filed by WAYNE APPLEGATE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (jjg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
