ROBINSON v. SALAMON et al
| TROY ROBINSON |
| BOBBI JO SALAMON and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY |
| 2:2021cv01320 |
| October 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Cynthia Reed Eddy |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 STATE COURT RECORDS received from Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County and forwarded to Chief Mag. Judge Eddy. Case Number(s): 2010-7055, 2011-6561. Transcript Number(s): T10-1071, T11-985, T11-1733, T12-1120, T12-1121, T11-1638. (sms) |
| Filing 10 TEXT ORDER: In accordance with the case management system in place in this district, this case has been assigned to the undersigned for all pretrial matters. Therefore, it is ORDERED that on or before 12/8/2021, the Petitioner shall complete an election form either consenting to jurisdiction by the Magistrate Judge or electing to have a District Judge assigned to the case, and shall file the form with the Clerk's Office. A copy of the form can be found on this Court's website at: http://www.pawd.uscourts.gov/sites/pawd/files/Consent-to-Mag.pdf. The Court notes that Respondents have filed their form. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 11/18/2021. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (cmc) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE to #3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, BOBBI JO SALAMON. (Attachments: #1 Appendix) (Bentley, Samantha) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, BOBBI JO SALAMON. (Bentley, Samantha) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY served on 10/28/2021, answer due 11/18/2021; BOBBI JO SALAMON served on 10/28/2021, answer due 11/18/2021. (cel) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Samantha Renee Bentley on behalf of DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, BOBBI JO SALAMON. (Bentley, Samantha) |
Filing 5
ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the United States Marshal shall make service of this order, together with a copy of the Petition, upon the Respondents: 1) the Superintendent of SCI Rockview; 2) the District Attorney of Allegheny County; and 3) the Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Service shall be by certified mail, with costs to be advanced by the United States. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within twenty-one (21) days of service of this Order, the District Attorney of Allegheny County shall respond to the Petition on behalf of all Respondents. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 10/14/2021. (cmc)
|
| Filing 4 Error: duplicate filing; this document removed from public view; Filing fee: $5, receipt number 24668071475 (cel) Modified text on 10/14/2021. (cel) |
| Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5, receipt number 24668071475), filed by TROY ROBINSON. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Envelope) (cel) |
| Filing 2 RECEIPT from Troy Robinson for Payment of Habeas Filing Fee received on 10/07/21 (cel) |
| Filing 1 Remark: Habeas Petition lodged without Motion for In Forma Pauperis or payment of filing fee (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Envelope) (cel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
