BRANTNER v. PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY
| MATTHEW BRANTNER |
| PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY |
| 2:2022cv00035 |
| January 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| David S Cercone |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER granting #16 Stipulation filed by PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY. This case is remanded to the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County FORTHWITH. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 2/22/2022. (kly)
|
| Filing 16 STIPULATION to Dismiss Count III, Cap Damages, and Remand by PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY. (Dapper, Kathleen) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER - the Initial Case Management Conference scheduled for Tuesday, March 1, 2022 at 1:00 PM shall be held telephonically and shall be held at 11:00 AM. All counsel who will be attending the conference shall email their direct dial telephone number to james_catanzarite@pawd.uscourts.gov on or before February 22, 2022. The Court will initiate the telephone call. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 2/16/2022. (jmc)
|
| Filing 14 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Ramaley, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 13 STIPULATION selecting ADR process by PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY. (Ramaley, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 12 REPLY BRIEF re #3 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY. (Dapper, Kathleen) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER - Plaintiff having filed a Motion to Remand #10 , Defendant shall file a Brief in Opposition on or befor 2/22/2022; Reply brief due by 3/1/2022. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 2/7/2022. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (jmc)
|
| Filing 10 BRIEF in Support re #9 Motion to Remand filed by MATTHEW BRANTNER. (Kelley, G.) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Remand by MATTHEW BRANTNER. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Kelley, G.) |
| Filing 8 BRIEF in Opposition re #3 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by MATTHEW BRANTNER. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (Kelley, G.) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (kak) |
|
Filing 6
INITIAL LOCAL RULE 16.1 SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Conference set for 3/1/2022 at 01:00 PM in Telephone Conference before Judge David S. Cercone. Rule 26 Meeting to be conducted on or before 2/8/2022. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 2/15/2022. Stipulation Selecting ADR Process due by 2/15/2022. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 1/18/2022. (kly)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER Response/Briefing Schedule re #3 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and #4 Brief in Support of Motion.Plaintiff's Response to Motion due by 2/3/2022. Reply may be filed by 2/10/2022. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 1/13/2022. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (kly)
|
| Filing 4 BRIEF in Support re #3 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY. (Dapper, Kathleen) |
| Filing 3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Dapper, Kathleen) |
| Filing 2 Disclosure Statement identifying Progressive Advanced Insurance Company, Midland Financial Group, Inc., Progressive Direct Holdings, Inc., The Progressive Corporation as corporate parents or other affiliates, by PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY. (sms) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, Docket Number GD-20-001178 (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-6886047), filed by PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J) (sms) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: BRANTNER v. PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MATTHEW BRANTNER | |
| Represented By: | G. Clinton Kelley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | Daniel J. Twilla |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey A. Ramaley |
| Represented By: | Kathleen P. Dapper |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
