GNC HOLDINGS, LLC v. JIANG, et al
GNC HOLDINGS, LLC |
LI JIANG and JOHN DOES 1-10 |
2:2022cv00762 |
May 24, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
J Nicholas Ranjan |
Arthur J Schwab |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by GNC HOLDINGS, LLC. LI JIANG served on 7/14/2022, answer due 8/4/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Motley, Martha) |
![]() |
Filing 7 BRIEF in Support re #6 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (Brief in Support of Motion for Alternative Service of Process) filed by GNC HOLDINGS, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C) (Motley, Martha) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Alternative Service of Process by GNC HOLDINGS, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Motley, Martha) |
![]() |
Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan added. (pak) |
Filing 4 Disclosure Statement identifying ZT Pharmaceutical LLC as corporate parent or other affiliate, by GNC HOLDINGS, LLC. (Motley, Martha) |
Filing 3 PATENT/TRADEMARK DOCUMENTS ISSUED. (sdp) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to LI JIANG (sdp) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against LI JIANG (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC 7117587), filed by GNC HOLDINGS, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (sdp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.