PITT ELECTRIC, INC. v. PITT ELECTRIC, INC. & CONSTRUCTION
| PITT ELECTRIC, INC. |
| PITT ELECTRIC, INC. & CONSTRUCTION |
| 2:2022cv00804 |
| June 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Kim R Gibson |
| W Scott Hardy |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #9 Answer to Complaint. ERROR: Party did not file disclosure statement as required pursuant L.R. 7.1.1. CORRECTION: Attorney advised to file statement within 7 days. Disclosure Statement due by 8/2/2022. (keh) |
| Filing 9 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint in Civil Action by PITT ELECTRIC, INC. & CONSTRUCTION. (Stoner, Daniel) |
| Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Civil Cover Sheet; Complaint in Civil Action; Letter from Collen Willison, Clerk of Court Dated June 2, 2022; Trademark Documents, and Summons in a Civil Action dated June 3, 2022 served on Pitt Electric, Inc. & Construction c/o Roy Lee Pitt, President of Pitt Electric, Inc. & Construction on June 6, 2022, filed by PITT ELECTRIC, INC.. (Ward, Joshua) |
| Judge Kim R. Gibson added. Judge W. Scott Hardy no longer assigned to case. (bgs) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE that the instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. The Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the Stipulation of Selecting an ADR process and Neutral. Counsel for Plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing Defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (dms) |
Filing 6
ORDER on Motions Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b). Signed by Judge W. Scott Hardy on 06/06/2022. (dms)
|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to PITT ELECTRIC, INC. & CONSTRUCTION (kss) |
| Filing 4 PRAECIPE to Issue Summons by PITT ELECTRIC, INC. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (Ward, Joshua) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to PITT ELECTRIC, INC. & CONSTRUCTION (kss) |
| Filing 2 PATENT/TRADEMARK DOCUMENTS ISSUED. (kss) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PITT ELECTRIC, INC. & CONSTRUCTION (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-7132629), filed by PITT ELECTRIC, INC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (kss) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: PITT ELECTRIC, INC. v. PITT ELECTRIC, INC. & CONSTRUCTION | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: PITT ELECTRIC, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Joshua P. Ward |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: PITT ELECTRIC, INC. & CONSTRUCTION | |
| Represented By: | Daniel H Stoner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
