SMITH v. ARMEL et al
JAMES THOMAS SMITH |
ERIC ARMEL, JOSH SHAPIRO and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ARMSTRONG COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA |
2:2022cv00973 |
July 5, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Patricia L Dodge |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed ERIC ARMEL served on 7/18/2022, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ARMSTRONG COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA served on 7/18/2022, and JOSH SHAPIRO served on 7/18/2022 (cel) Modified on 7/29/2022 (mqe). |
Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 MOTION to Hold in Abeyance, MOTION to Stay the #1 Petition for Wirt of Habeas Corpus by JAMES THOMAS SMITH. This case is STAYED and ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED as more fully stated in said Order. It is further ORDERED that the United States Marshal shall make service of this order, together with a copy of the Petition #1 upon the Respondents. Service shall be by certified mail. Costs to be advanced by the United States of America. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Dodge on 7/6/2022. (mqe) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Hold in Abeyance, MOTION to Stay the #1 Petition for Wirt of Habeas Corpus by JAMES THOMAS SMITH. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jv) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5, receipt number 24668075694), filed by JAMES THOMAS SMITH. (Attachments: #1 Receipt, #2 Envelope) (jv) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.