Hughes v. SoClean, Inc.
| Loreen Hughes |
| SoClean Inc |
| 2:2022cv01059 |
| July 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Joy Flowers Conti |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Case transferred in from District of Virginia Eastern; Case Number 3:22-cv-00445. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| Filing 2 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER FINALIZED (CTO-9) - 2 action(s) re: pldg. (1 in CAE/2:22-cv-01041, 135 in MDL No. 3021, 1 in VAE/3:22-cv-00445) Inasmuch as no objection is pending at this time, the stay is lifted. Signed by Clerk of the Panel John W. Nichols on 7/6/2022. (smej, ) |
| MINUTE ORDER - TO INVOLVED CLERKS - Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-9) Finalized on 7/6/22. Please see pleading (3 in CAE/2:22-cv-01041, 142 in MDL No. 3021, 3 in VAE/3:22-cv-00445).As stipulated in Rule 7.1(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, transmittal of the order has been stayed 7 days to give any party an opportunity to oppose the transfer.The 7-day period has now elapsed, no opposition was received, and the order is directed to the Clerk of the United States District Court for the W.D. Pennsylvania for filing. The Panel governing statute, 28 U.S.C. 1407, requires that the transferee clerk transmit a certified copy of the Panel order to transfer to the clerk of the district court from which the action is being transferred.Signed by Clerk of the Panel John W. Nichols on 7/6/2022.Associated Cases: MDL No. 3021, CAE/2:22-cv-01041, VAE/3:22-cv-00445 (CMD) (smej, ) |
| Case transferred to District of Western District of Pennsylvania per #2 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER FINALIZED (CTO-9) of the MDL Panel 3021. (smej, ) |
| Notice of Correction: Clerk contacted plaintiff's counsel via e-mail regarding the proposed summons or waiver of service. (smej, ) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge M. Hannah Lauck. (smej, ) |
| Notice of Correction: The filing attorney is instructed to file the proposed summons (on non-fillable forms) to serve the defendants, or if waiving service, to notify the court in writing by electronically filing the notice. (smej, ) |
| Filing 1 Complaint (Filing Fee: $402.00, Receipt Number: AVAEDC-8438022), filed by Loreen Hughes. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G) (Wise, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hughes v. SoClean, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Loreen Hughes | |
| Represented By: | David Hilton Wise |
| Represented By: | Joseph Michael Langone |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SoClean Inc | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
