Robert Murray v. Philips RS North America LLC et al
| ROBERT MURRAY |
| KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V, PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, PHILIPS R.S. NORTH AMERICA, LLC., PHILIPS HOLDING USA INC, Philips DS North America LLC, Dr Jeffrey R. Polito, DOES 1-25, inclusive, KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC. and PHILIPS HOLDING USA INC. |
| 2:2022cv01733 |
| December 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Joy Flowers Conti |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 Case transferred in from District of California Central; Case Number 2:22-cv-07882. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 24
ORDER LIFTING STAY OF CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER from the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, MDL 3014, transferring case to USDC, Western District Court of Pennsylvania and assigned to Honorable Joy Flowers Conti. Case transferred electronically. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (gk)
|
|
Filing 23
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING THE PHILIPS DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING TRANSFER TO MDL NO. 3014 by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Defendants' Motion to Stay #13 is GRANTED. All proceedings are STAYED until the action is transferred to the MDL and all hearings set before this Court are VACATED. The Court will defer ruling on the Motion to Remand #15 so that the MDL Court may consider the issue if the case is transferred. If the transfer is denied, the parties shall file a motion to lift the stay to proceed with litigation within 14 days of such denial and propose a new hearing date for Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk)
|
| Filing 22 RESPONSE IN SUPPORT of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Transfer to MDL 3014 #13 filed by Defendants Philips DS North America LLC, Philips Holding USA, Inc., Philips North America LLC, Philips RS North America LLC. (Lane, Molly) |
| Filing 21 OPPOSITION In Opposition To Motion To Remand re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Santa Barbara Superior Court - Cook Division #15 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Santa Barbara Superior Court - Cook Division #14 filed by Defendants Philips DS North America LLC, Philips Holding USA, Inc., Philips North America LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Opposition To Plaintiff Robert Murray's Motion To Remand, #2 Proposed Order Denying Motion To Remand)(Lane, Molly) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff All Plaintiffs, (Wideman, Richard) |
| Filing 19 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN FILED DOCUMENT RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Santa Barbara Superior Court - Cook Division #15 by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. A notice of interested parties shall be filed no later than 5 days from entry of this Order. (shb) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Santa Barbara Superior Court - Cook Division #15 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7-1.1 no notice of interested parties. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk) |
| Filing 17 Opposition to Conditional Transfer re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Transfer to MDL 3014 #13 filed by Plaintiff Robert Murray. (Wideman, Richard) |
| Filing 16 SUPPLEMENT to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Santa Barbara Superior Court - Cook Division #14 Notice of Errata filed by Plaintiff Robert Murray. (Wideman, Richard) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Santa Barbara Superior Court - Cook Division filed by Plaintiff Robert Murray. Motion set for hearing on 12/2/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Wideman, Richard) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Santa Barbara Superior Court - Cook Division filed by Plaintiff Robert Murray. Motion set for hearing on 12/2/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Wideman, Richard) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Transfer to MDL 3014 filed by Defendants Philips DS North America LLC, Philips Holding USA, Inc., Philips North America LLC. Motion set for hearing on 12/2/2022 at 10:10 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Proposed Order) (Attorney Molly Moriarty Lane added to party Philips DS North America LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Molly Moriarty Lane added to party Philips Holding USA, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Molly Moriarty Lane added to party Philips North America LLC(pty:dft)) (Lane, Molly) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Notice of Appearance #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Appearance of Withdrawal of Counsel G123.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Michael H Steinberg on behalf of Defendants Philips DS North America LLC, Philips Holding USA, Inc., Philips North America LLC (Steinberg, Michael) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: A claim initiating document was filed using a non-claim initiating event in CM/ECF. As a result, the case was not properly classified in the CM/ECF system. The error has been corrected by re-docketing the claim initiating document using the correct event. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. Complaint event utilized in docketing this filing; Clerk has to modified your docket entry to reflect the caption of document. In the future, counsel should use the SEARCH function on the CM/ECF toolbar for events if you are unsure of the events to use. (et) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney William B. Monahan on behalf of Defendants Philips North America, LLC, Philips Holding USA, Inc., and Philips DS North America LLC. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (et) |
| CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Koninklijke Philips N.V., Philips DS North America LLC, Philips Holding USA, Inc., Philips North America LLC, Philips RS North America LLC, Jeffrey R. Polito, Does 1-25, inclusive. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Robert Murray. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 9/30/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT A TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ]. (et) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Molly Moriarty Lane counsel for Defendant Philips RS North America LLC. Adding Molly Moriarty Lane as counsel of record for Philips RS North America LLC for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants Philips RS North America LLC. (Lane, Molly) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT STATEMENT OF DEFENDANT PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC AND NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES filed by Defendant Philips RS North America LLC identifying Koninklijke Philips Naamloze Venootschap as Corporate Parent. (Lane, Molly) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Philips RS North America LLC. (Lane, Molly) |
| Filing 1 [NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court for the State of California of Santa Barbara North County Case No. 22CV03807] FILED AS COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34236723 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendants Philips RS North America LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H) (Attorney Molly Moriarty Lane added to party Philips RS North America LLC(pty:dft))(Lane, Molly) Modified on 10/28/2022 (et). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
