EVANS v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER
| CHASE ARCHER EVANS |
| ALLEGHENY COUNTY OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER |
| 2:2023cv00098 |
| January 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| W Scott Hardy |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER Response/Briefing Schedule re #6 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's Response is due by 3/20/2023 and Defendant's Reply, if any, is due by 3/27/2023. Signed by Judge W. Scott Hardy on 2/27/2023. (kas)
|
| Filing 7 BRIEF in Support re #6 Motion to Dismiss filed by ALLEGHENY COUNTY OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER. (Biondo, Dennis) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by ALLEGHENY COUNTY OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Supplement Certificate of Conferral, #3 Proposed Order) (Biondo, Dennis) Modified text on 3/17/2023. (cel) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Defendant's response to Plaintiff's Complaint is due on or before 3/3/2023. Signed by Judge W. Scott Hardy on 2/10/2023. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (kas)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by ALLEGHENY COUNTY OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Biondo, Dennis) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER on Motions Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b). See attached Order for details. Signed by Judge W. Scott Hardy on 01/20/2023. (dms)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE that the instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. The Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the Stipulation of Selecting an ADR process and Neutral. Counsel for Plaintiff(s) (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing Defendant(s)) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (dms) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Allegheny County, case number GD-22-14335 (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-7495527), filed by ALLEGHENY COUNTY OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B) (cel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: EVANS v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: CHASE ARCHER EVANS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ALLEGHENY COUNTY OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER | |
| Represented By: | Dennis R. Biondo, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
