BULLY MAX LLC v. REPLENISH PET INC.
BULLY MAX LLC |
REPLENISH PET INC. |
2:2023cv00101 |
January 19, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Marilyn J Horan |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Answer by BULLY MAX LLC Answer due from REPLENISH PET INC on April 25, 2023 (Brooks, Anthony) Modified text to add date on 3/13/2023. (keh) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by BULLY MAX LLC. (Brooks, Anthony) |
Filing 10 Summons Issued as to REPLENISH PET INC. (keh) |
Filing 9 PRAECIPE to Issue Summons by BULLY MAX LLC (Attachments: #1 Summons to Defendant) (Brooks, Anthony) |
Filing 8 Errata re #6 Notice of Appearance by BULLY MAX LLC. Reason for Correction: Wrong attorney filer & attorney. (Coyne, Barry) |
Filing 7 Errata re #5 Notice of Appearance by BULLY MAX LLC. Reason for Correction: Wrong attorney filer & attorney. (McIlvaine, John) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Anthony W. Brooks on behalf of BULLY MAX LLC. (Brooks, Anthony) Document removed from public view and refiled as Errata at #8 . Modified text on 2/13/2023. (keh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Anthony W. Brooks on behalf of BULLY MAX LLC. (Brooks, Anthony) Document removed from public view and refiled as Errata at #7 . Modified text on 2/13/2023. (keh) |
Filing 4 Disclosure Statement by BULLY MAX LLC. (Brooks, Anthony) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER AND PROCEDURES ON CIVIL MOTION PRACTICE available #Here. Signed by Judge Marilyn J. Horan on 1/23/2023. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bjl) |
Filing 2 PATENT/TRADEMARK DOCUMENTS ISSUED. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit L, #14 Exhibit M, #15 Exhibit N, #16 Docket Sheet) (keh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against REPLENISH PET INC. (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-7496175), filed by BULLY MAX LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit L, #14 Exhibit M, #15 Exhibit N) (keh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: BULLY MAX LLC v. REPLENISH PET INC. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: BULLY MAX LLC | |
Represented By: | Anthony W. Brooks |
Represented By: | Barry J. Coyne |
Represented By: | John W. McIlvaine, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: REPLENISH PET INC. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.