ONESKO v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
Petitioner: PATRICK I. ONESKO
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, WARDEN OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Case Number: 2:2023cv00413
Filed: March 10, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Patricia L Dodge
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER DIRECTING that the United States Marshal shall make service of this order, together with a copy of the petition and brief in support, upon the respondents by certified mail, costs to be advanced by the United States. Within 21 days of service of this order, the Respondents shall respond to the allegations of the petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Dodge on 4/13/2023. (mqe)
April 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER adding the District Attorney of Allegheny County as a respondent in this habeas case. This is in accordance with Local Rule 2254.B.1, which explains that when a petitioner is challenging his or her state court conviction or sentence in a 2254 action, he or she must name as a respondent "the District Attorney of the county in which he or she was convicted and sentenced." It is further ORDERED that by 4/18/23 counsel for Petitioner shall provide the Court with three service copies of the #1 Petition and #6 Brief. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Dodge on 4/4/23. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (jpe)
March 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 BRIEF in support of #1 Writ of Habeas Corpus by PATRICK I. ONESKO. (Confusione, Michael) Modified text on 3/29/2023. (jv)
March 29, 2023 Opinion or Order CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #6 Motion for Writ of Habeas Corpus. ERROR: Wrong event selected. CORRECTION: Terminated as a motion since court Modified original entry as #6 BRIEF in support of #1 Writ of Habeas Corpus. This message is for informational purposes only. (jv)
March 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER. Petitioner shall file a memorandum of law in support of the Petition by 3/29/2023. See Local Rule 2254.B.2.b. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Dodge on 3/15/23. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (jpe)
March 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Michael Confusione to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Dodge on 3/15/23. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (jpe)
March 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Proposed Order re #2 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice by PATRICK I. ONESKO. (Confusione, Michael)
March 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for attorney Michael James Confusione to Appear Pro Hac Vice, for Petitioner Patrick I. Onesko (Filing fee $70, Receipt # APAWDC-7588034) by PATRICK I. ONESKO. (Confusione, Michael)
March 14, 2023 Opinion or Order CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #2 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. ERROR: Proposed Order was not attached. CORRECTION: Attorney is advised to file a proposed order by using the Proposed Order event and linking it to the document in question. (jv)
March 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Receipt No. APAWDC-7582593, $5, ), filed by PATRICK I. ONESKO. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jv)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ONESKO v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: PATRICK I. ONESKO
Represented By: Michael Confusione
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: WARDEN OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?