OWUSU ANSAGH v. SUPERIOR HOME CARE AGENCY et al
NIEYA ANDIE OWUSU ANSAGH |
ELIZABETH WILLIAMS, SUPERIOR HOME CARE AGENCY and TREASE ATKINS |
2:2024cv01115 |
August 5, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
David S Cercone |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Civil Rights: Other |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 BRIEF in Support re #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by NIEYA ANDIE OWUSU ANSAGH. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit) (elt) Modified text on 9/23/2024 to correct pleading type and seal Exhibit 2 (PII). (lyk) |
Judge Cercone added as Presider. Case was reassigned in category 4. Judge Brown no longer assigned to the case, as it was assigned previously in category 2, which was the incorrect category. (ert) Modified text on 8/7/2024. (ept) |
Magistrate Judge Christopher B. Brown no longer assigned to case due to selection being made in the incorrect category number. (ert) |
Filing 2 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by NIEYA ANDIE OWUSU ANSAGH. (dmh) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by NIEYA ANDIE OWUSU ANSAGH. (Attachments: #1 Complaint lodged pending disposition of IFP Motion, #2 Exhibit, #3 Summons) (dmh) |
Magistrate Judge Christopher B. Brown added. (dmh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.