NEALEN v. WINNECOUR
Appellant: JOHN J. NEALEN
Appellee: RONDA J. WINNECOUR
Case Number: 3:2008cv00187
Filed: July 24, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Bankruptcy Appeal (801) Office
County: Cambria
Presiding Judge: Kim R. Gibson
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER OF COURT - it is hereby Ordered that the Appellant's appeals docketed at Civil Action Numbers 3:2008-187 and 3:2008-188 are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for his failure to prosecute these appeals, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Opinion and Order of Court. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 3/26/2009. (dlg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NEALEN v. WINNECOUR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: JOHN J. NEALEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: RONDA J. WINNECOUR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?