LUNDGREN v. AMERISTAR CREDIT SOLUTIONS INC

Justia Dockets & Filings Third Circuit Pennsylvania Western District LUNDGREN v. AMERISTAR CREDIT SOLUTIONS INC

LUNDGREN v. AMERISTAR CREDIT SOLUTIONS INC

Plaintiff:	GARY W. LUNDGREN
Defendant:	AMERISTAR CREDIT SOLUTIONS INC
Case Number:	3:2012cv00263
Filed:	December 31, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Johnstown Office
County:	Cambria
Presiding Judge:	Kim R. Gibson
Nature of Suit:	Trademark
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 18, 2014	Filing 33 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - upon consideration of Defendant's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 19 ), and in accordance with the accompanying memorandum opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GR ANTED in part. JUDGMENT is hereby entered in favor of Defendant, AmeriStar Credit Solutions, Inc., and against Plaintiff, Gary Lundgren, as to Plaintiff's 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a) claims (Counts I and II). FURTHER, the Court declines to exercis e supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's state law claims and hereby DISMISSES these claims (Counts III, IV, V, and VI) without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Gary Lundgren's motion for leave to file documents out of time (ECF No. 30 ) is DENIED as moot. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall mark this case closed, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 8/18/2014. (dlg)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 18, 2014

Filing 33 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - upon consideration of Defendant's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 19 ), and in accordance with the accompanying memorandum opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GR ANTED in part. JUDGMENT is hereby entered in favor of Defendant, AmeriStar Credit Solutions, Inc., and against Plaintiff, Gary Lundgren, as to Plaintiff's 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a) claims (Counts I and II). FURTHER, the Court declines to exercis e supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's state law claims and hereby DISMISSES these claims (Counts III, IV, V, and VI) without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Gary Lundgren's motion for leave to file documents out of time (ECF No. 30 ) is DENIED as moot. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall mark this case closed, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 8/18/2014. (dlg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LUNDGREN v. AMERISTAR CREDIT SOLUTIONS INC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: GARY W. LUNDGREN
Represented By:	Daniel W. Ernsberger
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: AMERISTAR CREDIT SOLUTIONS INC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?