YOUNG v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ZEIDERS
Plaintiff: TYRELL R. YOUNG
Defendant: CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ZEIDERS
Case Number: 3:2013cv00149
Filed: July 12, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Johnstown Office
County: Clearfield
Presiding Judge: Kim R. Gibson
Presiding Judge: Maureen P. Kelly
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 11 AMENDED MEMORANDUM ORDER re 6 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ZEIDERS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 2/7/2014. (bb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: YOUNG v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ZEIDERS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ZEIDERS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TYRELL R. YOUNG
Represented By: John K. Bryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?