WHITEHEAD v. WETZEL et al
| CARL WHITEHEAD |
| JOHN E. WETZEL, DORINA VARNER, TRACY WILLIAMS, JAMES C. BARNACLE, DENISE THOMAS, BARRY GRUBB, GERALD L. ROZUM, DANIEL GEHLMANN, MELISSA HAINSWORTH, C/O SHAFER, ALLEN G. JOSEPH, LT. BAKOS, LT. BARBARICH, C/O COPHENOUR, C/O BOWMAN, C/O SLEDGE, LT. CLIPPENGER, DIANE KOLESOR, J. ELLISON, LT. KESTERKO, JOSEPH DUPONT, SGT. CINKO, C/O EHRHART, JOSEPH BIANCONI, ROBIN M. LEWIS, DR. MAHMOD, DARLENE CHANEY and LT. WADSWORTH |
| 3:2014cv00051 |
| March 19, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Johnstown Office |
| Somerset |
| Cynthia Reed Eddy |
| Kim R. Gibson |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
127
MEMORANDUM ORDER - It is hereby Ordered that Plaintiff's Motions for Summary Judgment [ECF Nos. 110 , 111]] are DENIED. It is further Ordered that Dr. Rashida Mahmud's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 107 ] is GRANTED and that summar y judgment is entered in her favor. It is further Ordered that Commonwealth Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 101 ] is GRANTED and that summary judgment is entered in their favor. It is further Ordered that the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 126 ] is adopted as the Opinion of the Court, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 6/20/2017. (dlg)
|
|
Filing
125
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying as moot 117 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying as moot 117 Motion for TRO; 124 Report and Recommendation is adopted as the Opinion of the District Court. It is further Ordered that the case is remanded to Magistrate Judge Eddy for all further pretrial proceedings, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 2/28/2017. (dlg)
|
|
Filing
94
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting in part and denying in part 86 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. It is further Ordered that Defendant Dr. Rashida Mahmud's motion to dismiss [ECF No. 88 ] be granted in part and denied in part. It is further Ordered that the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 91 ] of Magistrate Judge Eddy is hereby ADOPTED as the Opinion of the District Court. It is further Ordered that the case is remanded to Magistrate Judge Eddy for all further pretrial proceedings, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 6/27/2016. (dlg)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER - Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint on or before August 31, 2015, which satisfies Rule 20. Defendants' motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 50 and 53 ) are hereby dismissed without prejudice to refiling same after the amended complaint is filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 8/6/2015. (bsc)
|
|
Filing
67
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 63 Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court filed by CARL WHITEHEAD - for the reasons stated in said Memorandum Opinion, the Court finds that Whitehead did not show that the magistrate judge's rulings were clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Accordingly, Plaintiff's appeal is DENIED, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Opinion. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 1/30/2015. (dlg)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER denying 62 Motion for Rule 60 Motion for Relief from Judgment filed by Plaintiff, Carl Whitehead. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 1/12/015. (bsc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
