DONALDSON et al v. LENSBOUER et al
| JANINE DONALDSON and KIMBERLY MCKENZIE |
| RONALD LENSBOUER and SOMERSET COUNTY |
| 3:2015cv00063 |
| March 11, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Johnstown Office |
| Somerset |
| Kim R. Gibson |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
114
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 63 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 65 Motion in Limine; granting 67 Motion in Limine; denying in part and deferred in part 69 Motion in Limine; denying as moot 71 Motion in Limine; denying as moot 73 Motion in Limine; denying as moot 75 Motion in Limine; denying as moot 77 Motion in Limine; granting 79 Motion in Limine; denying as modified 81 Motion in Limine; granting 84 Motion in Limine, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 11/21/2017. (dlg)
|
|
Filing
56
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 41 Motion for Summary Judgment. To wit, the motion is granted insofar as it relates to Plaintiff's retaliation claim, which Plaintiff has agreed to withdraw, and denied in all other respects, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 5/18/2017. (dlg) Modified on 5/18/2017. (dlg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
