KING v. HARMOTTA et al
| CHARLES E. KING |
| DIANE HARMOTTA, M. VEIL GRIFFITH and DOUGLAS LENGENFELDER |
| 3:2015cv00297 |
| November 18, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Johnstown Office |
| Cambria |
| Kim R. Gibson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - upon consideration of the Defendants' motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 15 , 17 ), and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby Ordered that Defendants' motions are GRANTED. It is f urther Ordered that the due process claims are dismissed with prejudice and the First Amendment and defamation claims are dismissed without prejudice. It is further Ordered that Plaintiff is granted 21 days from 3/21/2017, to file an amended complaint as to the First Amendment and defamation claims, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 3/21/2017. (dlg)
|
|
Filing
11
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 7 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 9 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. It is further Ordered that Plaintiff is granted 21 days from 7/5/2016 to file an amended complaint, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 7/5/2016. (dlg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
