SMITH v. NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC

Plaintiff: GREGORY J. SMITH
Defendant: NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC
Case Number: 3:2017cv00191
Filed: October 17, 2017
Court: Pennsylvania Western District Court
Office: Johnstown Office
County: Somerset
Presiding Judge: Kim R. Gibson
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 42:205
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 31, 2018 28 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - upon consideration of Smith's Motion to Amend (ECF No. 24 ), and in accordance with the attached memorandum opinion, it is hereby Ordered that the motion is DENIED, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 7/31/2018. (dlg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SMITH v. NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GREGORY J. SMITH
Represented By: Alla A. Gulchina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC
Represented By: Thomas Lucchesi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?