DAVIS v. BRADLEY
| ELIJAH DAVIS |
| ERIC BRADLEY |
| 3:2018cv00179 |
| September 14, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Kim R Gibson |
| Keith A Pesto |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Substitution of Attorney Appearance by Adam Fischer on behalf of ERIC BRADLEY. Attorney Karen Gal-Or terminated. (Fischer, Adam) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by ELIJAH DAVIS. ERIC BRADLEY served on 9/24/2018, answer due 10/15/2018. (jd) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Change of Address by ELIJAH DAVIS. FILER advised that the change of address has been made on above captioned matter only. If you wish to have address changed on other matters before this court, it is your responsibility to file such a notice at each case number. This NEF has been mailed to ELIJAH DAVIS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jd) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by ERIC BRADLEY. (Gal-Or, Karen) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Karen Gal-Or on behalf of ERIC BRADLEY. (Gal-Or, Karen) |
| Filing 4 BRIEF in Support of #3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by ELIJAH DAVIS. (plp) |
| Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by ELIJAH DAVIS. (plp) |
Filing 2
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; the Marshal shall make service of the petition and this Rule and Order on the respondent, the Attorney General and the United States Attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania, costs to be advanced by the United States. Within sixty days of service of this Rule and Order, respondent, through the United States Attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania, shall file a response to the allegations of the petition for writ of habeas corpus showing cause, if any, why the writ should not be granted.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto on 9/18/2018. (plp)
|
|
Forwarded to U.S. Marshal copies of order dated 9/18/2018 and signed by Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto along with copies of petition and docket sheet, for service on respondents. This is a text-only entry, no PDF document will issue. (plp)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ELIJAH DAVIS. Motion(s) referred to Keith A. Pesto. (Attachments: #1 HABEAS, #2 BRIEF, #3 Exhibit, #4 Envelope) (jd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: DAVIS v. BRADLEY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: ELIJAH DAVIS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: ERIC BRADLEY | |
| Represented By: | Karen Gal-Or |
| Represented By: | Adam Fischer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
