ADAMS v. BLACK & DECKER (U.S.) INC.
Plaintiff: DAVID ADAMS
Defendant: BLACK & DECKER (U.S.) INC.
Case Number: 3:2018cv00244
Filed: December 4, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Kim R Gibson
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 23, 2019 Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative defenses by BLACK & DECKER (U.S.) INC. (Sostmann, Stuart)
January 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER OF COURT granting #12 Motion to Extend Pleading Deadline. It is further Ordered that Defendant Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc. shall file a response to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint on or before 1/28/2019. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 1/16/2019. (dlg)
January 15, 2019 Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by BLACK & DECKER (U.S.) INC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Sostmann, Stuart)
January 9, 2019 NOTICE of Hearing: Initial Case Management Conference scheduled for 1/25/2019 is RESCHEDULED to 2/15/2019 at 1:30 PM before Judge Kim R. Gibson. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Court's order or notice on the matter. (dlg)
December 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER re #10 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Answer filed by BLACK & DECKER (U.S.) INC.; Response to the Amended Complaint is due on 1/16/2019. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 12/21/2018. (cel) Modified text on 12/26/2018. (cel)
December 21, 2018 Filing 10 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Answer by BLACK & DECKER (U.S.) INC. Answer due from DAVID ADAMS on 1/16/2019. (Sostmann, Stuart)
December 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER denying as moot #5 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim because of the filing of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (ECF No. #8 ). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(3), Defendant must file its Answer or new Motion to Dismiss on or before January 2, 2019. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 12/19/2018. (dlg)
December 19, 2018 Filing 8 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against BLACK & DECKER (U.S.) INC., filed by DAVID ADAMS. (Schiffman, Jason) Modified text on 12/21/2018. (jjg)
December 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER - Case Management Conference set for 1/25/2019 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom A - Johnstown before Judge Kim R. Gibson, and as more fully stated in said Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 12/12/2018. (Attachments: (1) Exhibit "A" Stipulation, (2) Exhibit "B" Report, (3) Exhibit "C" Order). (krh)
December 12, 2018 NOTICE of Hearing: The Initial Rule 16 Case Management Conference scheduled for 10:00 AM on 1/25/2019 is RESCHEDULED to 3:00 PM on 1/25/2019. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Court's order or notice on the matter. (dlg)
December 11, 2018 Filing 6 BRIEF in Support re #5 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by BLACK & DECKER (U.S.) INC.. (Sostmann, Stuart)
December 11, 2018 Filing 5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by BLACK & DECKER (U.S.) INC.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Sostmann, Stuart)
December 5, 2018 Filing 4 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by BLACK & DECKER (U.S.) INC. (Sostmann, Stuart)
December 5, 2018 Filing 3 Disclosure Statement identifying Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc.; Black & Decker Inc.; The Black & Decker Corporation; Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. as corporate parent or other affiliate, by BLACK & DECKER (U.S.) INC. (Sostmann, Stuart)
December 4, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE that the instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (krh)
December 4, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, case number GD-17-15829 (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 0315-4953049), filed by BLACK & DECKER (U.S.) INC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B - Including Complaint, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D) (jv)
December 4, 2018 CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #1 Notice of Removal,. ERROR: Party did not file disclosure statement as required pursuant L.R. 7.1.1. CORRECTION: Attorney advised to file statement within 7 days. This message is for informational purposes only. Disclosure Statement due by 12/11/2018. (jv)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ADAMS v. BLACK & DECKER (U.S.) INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BLACK & DECKER (U.S.) INC.
Represented By: Stuart H. Sostmann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DAVID ADAMS
Represented By: Jason M. Schiffman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?