HAMMEL v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY
| RODERICK R. HAMMEL |
| NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY |
| 3:2021cv00059 |
| April 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Stephanie L Haines |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Proposed Initial Scheduling Order - Joint by NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY. (Hampton, Daniel) |
| Filing 10 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Hampton, Daniel) |
Filing 9
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 and 16.2, an Initial Rule 16 Case Management Conference shall be held on 6/3/2021, at 1:30 p.m., and as more fully stated in said Case Management Order. Signed by Judge Stephanie L. Haines on 5/4/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "A" - Stipulation Selecting ADR, #2 Exhibit "B" - Fed.R.Civ. P. 26(f) Report, #3 Exhibit "C" - Initial Scheduling Order) (dlg)
|
| Filing 8 Disclosure Statement identifying Norfolk Southern Corporation as corporate parent or other affiliate, by NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY. (Hampton, Daniel) |
| Filing 7 Affirmative Defenses and ANSWER to #1 Complaint by NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY. (Hampton, Daniel) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel J. Hampton on behalf of NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY. (Hampton, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by T. H. Lyda on behalf of NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY. (Lyda, T.) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint and Summons served on Registered Agent for Defendant, Dave Bulakowski c/o Corporation Service Company on 04/14/2021, filed by RODERICK R. HAMMEL. (Coston, John) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (sas) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY (jd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number BPAWDC-6439035), filed by RODERICK R. HAMMEL. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: HAMMEL v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: RODERICK R. HAMMEL | |
| Represented By: | John Harry Coston, IV |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | Daniel J. Hampton |
| Represented By: | T. H. Lyda |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
