Donahue v. Brittain et al
| Kelly B. Donahue |
| PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE and Kathy Brittain |
| 3:2024cv00243 |
| October 16, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Keith A Pesto |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Case transferred in from District of Pennsylvania Middle; Case Number 4:24-cv-01119. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto added. (rjr) |
Filing 10
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) and 28 U.S.C. 2241(d), and in the exercise of this Court's discretion, the Clerk of Court is directed to TRANSFER this case to the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. Thereafter, the Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case. Signed by Chief Judge Matthew W. Brann on 10/11/2024. (ea)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response by Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office.(nr) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent shall, within 14 days of the date of this Order, file a response to the instant petition or a motion for enlargement of time to respond. Signed by Chief Judge Matthew W. Brann on 9/27/2024. (ea)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is DEEMED FILED. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve the #1 petition for a writ of habeas corpus and this Order on the Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Respondent, and the District Attorney for Clearfield County. Show Cause Response due by 9/5/2024. (See Order for further details.) Signed by Chief Judge Matthew W. Brann on 8/15/2024. (ea)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ELECTION by Kelly B. Donahue choosing to have the court rule on his petition as filed. (nr) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner is granted leave to withdraw the current 2254 petition without prejudice to filing another 2254 petition raising all grounds for relief from his conviction. Petitioner is granted 45 days from the date of this Order to notify the court of his decision. If he fails to do so, the Court will rule on the current 2254 petition as filed. (See Order for further details.) Signed by Chief Judge Matthew W. Brann on 7/30/2024. (ea)
|
| Receipt of payment from KELLY B. DONAHUE in the amount of $5.00 for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Transaction posted on 7/24/2024. Receipt number 333110873 processed by DJ. (jjs) Modified on 8/21/2024 (nr). |
| Filing 4 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 333110873. Petition is now deemed FILED. (ep) |
| Filing 3 THIRTY (30) DAY ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER directing the prisoner to pay the filing fee or file a signed Application to Proceed IFP within 30 days or case will be dismissed. Signed by LP on 07/08/2024. (Attachments: #1 IFP (habeas corpus))(lp) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE LETTER ISSUED providing the case number and the AO 85 Notice & Consent Form. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Consent) (lp) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged as no filing fee was paid and no Motion for In Forma Pauperis was filed, filed by Kelly B. Donahue. Petitioner submitted a $10.00 filing fee which was returned as it was the incorrect filing fee amount.(lp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
