Maya-Gambino v. Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico et al
| Joseph Maya-Gambino |
| Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico, Junta de Libertad Bajo Palabra, Maria E. Melendez-Rivera, Edwin Zayaz-Figueroa, Lyzzette Tanon-Melendez and Alba T. Reyes-Bermudez |
| 3:2009cv01117 |
| February 10, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Ponce |
| Jose A Fuste |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 60 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Maria E. Melendez-Rivera, Edwin Zayaz-Figueroa, Alba T. Reyes-Bermudez, Lyzzette Tanon-Melendez. Judgment shall enter dismissing with prejudice Plaintiffs' complaint against all remaining defendants. Signed by Chief Judge Jose A Fuste on 11/30/2010.(mrj)
|
|
Filing
34
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 16 MOTION to dismiss as to Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Junta de Libertad Bajo Palabra filed by Junta de Libertad Bajo Palabra, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. We DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE the complaint as to the Commonwealth o f Puerto Rico and the Junta de Libertad Bajo Palabra (Parole Board). Plaintiff's claims against Maria Melendez-Rivera, Edwin Zayas-Figueroa, Lyzzette Tanon-Melendez, and Alba T. Reyes-Bermudez remain. Signed by Chief Judge Jose A Fuste on 3/25/2010.(mrj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
