Cellmark Pulp & Paper, Inc. v. Impresos Quintana, Inc.

Plaintiff: Cellmark Pulp & Paper, Inc.
Defendant: Impresos Quintana, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2009cv01566
Filed: June 22, 2009
Court: Puerto Rico District Court
Office: San Juan Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Jaime Pieras, Jr
Referring Judge:
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 16, 2009 18 Opinion or Order of the Court CONSENT JUDGMENT for Plaintiff in the amount of $194,166.36, plus interest accrued at 1.5% monthly since December 2008, without the imposition of costs or attorney's fees. Signed by Judge Jaime Pieras, Jr. on 9/16/2009. (mld)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cellmark Pulp & Paper, Inc. v. Impresos Quintana, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cellmark Pulp & Paper, Inc.
Represented By: Carlos M. Hernandez-Burgos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Impresos Quintana, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?