Chevron Puerto Rico, LLC v. Martinez-Valentin et al
| Chevron Puerto Rico, LLC |
| Angel J. Martinez-Valentin, John Doe and ABC Company, Inc. |
| 3:2010cv01192 |
| March 5, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| San Juan Office |
| San Juan |
| Jaime Pieras, Jr |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
OPINION AND ORDER - GRANTING Plaintiff's 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; DENYING Plaintiff's: 12 Motion requesting Permanent Injunction, 24 Emergency Motion Requesting Order Granting Permanent Injunction, 25 Motion for Hearing, and 26 Motion for Default Entry as to Angel J. Martinez-Valentin. Defendant is ORDERED to surrender the Station and its equipment to Plaintiff and to comply with post-termination covenants of the Agreements between the parties. Plaintiff's proof of service deadline due by 1/21/2011; Plaintiff's deadline to post a $2,000 security with the Court due by 1/24/2011. Signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Fuste on 1/10/2011. (mld)
|
|
Filing
27
OPINION AND ORDER - GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART Defendant Angel J. Martinez-Valentin's 8 Motion to Quash Service; DENYING Defendant Angel J. Martinez-Valentin's 17 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's Deadline to serve process on Defendant Martinez and file Proof of Service due by 11/15/2010. Signed by Judge Jaime Pieras, Jr. on 10/27/2010. (mld)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
