Rodriguez-Alicea v. Mitsubishi Motor Sales of Caribbean Inc.

Defendant: Mitsubishi Motor Sales of Caribbean Inc.
Plaintiff: Gil Rodriguez-Alicea
Case Number: 3:2013cv01280
Filed: April 8, 2013
Court: Puerto Rico District Court
Office: San Juan Office
County: Carolina
Presiding Judge: Gustavo A. Gelpi
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 31, 2013 13 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION AND ORDER: Granting 12 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge Gustavo A. Gelpi on 7/31/13. (CL) Modified on 7/31/2013 as to title (er).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodriguez-Alicea v. Mitsubishi Motor Sales of Caribbean Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mitsubishi Motor Sales of Caribbean Inc.
Represented By: James Belk-Arce
Represented By: Carlos J. Grovas-Porrata
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gil Rodriguez-Alicea
Represented By: Ivan L. Pagan-Hernandez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.