Puerto Rico Coffee Roasters LLC v. Pan American Grain Manufacturing Co., Inc.
Puerto Rico Coffee Roasters LLC |
Pan American Grain Manufacturing Co., Inc. |
3:2015cv02099 |
August 12, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
San Juan Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Jose A. Fuste |
Trademark |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 122 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 38 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Pan American Grain Manufacturing Co., Inc. Specifically, the court dismisses Counts IV, V, VII, and VIII in their entiret y. The court dismisses most of Count VI, leaving in place, for the time being, only an Article 1802 claim that duplicates P.R. Coffee Roasters' valid federal trademark claims. Meanwhile, Counts I, II, and III appear to state plausible claims on their face and do not warrant dismissal under the arguments in the motion. Signed by Judge Jose A. Fuste on 12/11/2015.(mrj) |
Filing 26 ORDER denying 14 Motion to Strike, 24 MOTION to Strike. The court hereby reminds Defendant that, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(1)(A)(i), it must serve an answer within 21 days after being served with the summons and complaint. PAG has acknowledged that they received service of process on September 2, 2015. (ECF No. 10 3.) The court will not grant PAG an extension of time for the answer. Signed by Judge Jose A. Fuste on 09/15/2015. (mrj) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.