Vizcarrondo-Gonzalez v. Vilsack et al
| Ana Vizcarrondo-Gonzalez |
| Thomas J Vilsack, United States Department of Agriculture and Eliud Rivera |
| 3:2016cv02461 |
| August 8, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| San Juan Office |
| Canovanas |
| Pedro A. Delgado-Hernandez |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
OPINION AND ORDER: See attached. The United States substitutes Mr. Rivera as the defendant in connection with the intentional tort claim in line with 28 U.S.C. § 2679(d), and in turn, that claim is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2401(b), 2675(a), and 2680(h). Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge Pedro A. Delgado-Hernandez on 10/26/2020.(LMR)
|
|
Filing
63
OPINION AND ORDER with the grounds in support of the court's conclusion at Docket No. 61 . See attached. Plaintiff's Title VII claims are dismissed. Analysis of the tort claim requires further briefing in light of the Federal Tort Claims Act. See, Section IV of the Opinion for deadlines. Signed by Judge Pedro A. Delgado-Hernandez on 03/20/2020.(LMR)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER: Granting in part and denying in part codefendant Eliud Rivera's 12 "Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction." See Opinion and Order attached. Signed by Judge Pedro A. Delgado-Hernandez on 7/28/2017. (IFN)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
