Revere High Yield Fund, LP v. Hegon Corporation et al
| REVERE HIGH YIELD FUND, LP |
| EFRON DORADO, S.E., DAVID EFRON and HEGON CORPORATION |
| 3:2018cv01812 |
| October 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| Daniel R Dominguez |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Leave to File. Due to the Holiday Season, defendants are to respond to Motion at Dkt. No. #9 by January 10, 2018. Signed by Judge Daniel R. Dominguez on 12/14/2018. (EA)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to File Document Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Show Cause filed by David Efron on behalf of David Efron Responses due by 12/28/2018. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Efron, David) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE filed by All Plaintiffs Re: 8 Order to Show Cause,, filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (First Amended Complaint filed in Florida State Court))(Saavedra-Castro, Juan) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Plaintiffs are ordered to show cause as to the reasons why the instant action should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as there is an allegation of lack of indispensable party that would destroy diversity jurisdiction before this Court, and a similar action is currently pending before the Miami-Dade County Circuit Court and set for trial in February 2019. Show Cause Response due by 12/17/2018. Signed by Judge Daniel R. Dominguez on 11/26/2018. (EA)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER noted #6 Motion requesting Order. Signed by Judge Daniel R. Dominguez on 11/26/2018. (EA)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION requesting Order to Hold in Abeyance Preliminary Injunction filed by David Efron on behalf of David Efron Responses due by 12/5/2018. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Efron, David) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER denying without prejudice #4 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. As "[t]he court may issue a preliminary injunction only on notice to the adverse party" and plaintiffs have failed to submit evidence of proper notification to the defendants of said motion, the Court DENIES plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 65(a)(1). Plaintiffs may resubmit the instant request upon proper compliance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Judge Daniel R. Dominguez on 11/20/2018. (EA)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Juan H. Saavedra-Castro on behalf of All Plaintiffs Responses due by 12/3/2018. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit (Proposed Form of Order On Motion For Preliminary Injunctive Relief))(Saavedra-Castro, Juan) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to David Efron, Efron Dorado, S.E., Hegon Corporation (Attachments: #1 Summons) (arg) Modified on 11/1/2018 edit text (gav). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT Case has been assigned to Judge Daniel R. Dominguez (arg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $400 receipt number 0104-6124903.), filed by Revere High Yield Fund, LP. Service due by 1/28/2019, (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Sheet, #3 Summons David Efron, #4 Summons Efron Dorado, S.E., #5 Summons Hegon Corporation)(Saavedra-Castro, Juan) Modified on 11/1/2018 edit text (gav). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
