Perez-Abreu et al v. Metropol Hato Rey LLC et al
| Olga Felix-Ancona, Francisco Perez-Abreu and Conjugal Partnership Perez-Felix |
| Metropol Hato Rey LLC and Restaurant Metropol 3 INC. |
| 3:2018cv01865 |
| November 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| Juan M Perez-Gimenez |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Metropol Hato Rey LLC, Restaurant Metropol 3 INC. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (vdm) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Issuance of Summons. Signed by Judge Juan M. Perez-Gimenez on 01/08/2019. (NNR)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants filed by Javier A. Rivera-Vaquer on behalf of All Plaintiffs Responses due by 1/22/2019. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: #1 Summons 1, #2 Summons 2)(Rivera-Vaquer, Javier) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT Case has been assigned to Judge Juan M. Perez-Gimenez. (arg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $400 receipt number 0104-6145237.), filed by Francisco Perez-Abreu, Olga Felix-Ancona. Service due by 2/11/2019, (Attachments: #1 Category Sheet, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rivera-Vaquer, Javier) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
