Gonzalez-Rosario v. Schindler of Puerto Rico LLC
| Raquel Gonzalez-Rosario |
| Schindler of Puerto Rico LLC |
| 3:2019cv01630 |
| June 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| William G Young |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion for Second Extension filed by Raquel Gonzalez-Rosario Re: #7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint or Otherwise Plead re: #1 Complaint filed by Schindler of Puerto Rico LLC. (Cancio-Valdivia, Jorge) Modified on 8/26/2019 edit text (gav). |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint or Otherwise Plead re: #1 Complaint, filed by Raquel Gonzalez-Rosario filed by Carlos J. Grovas-Porrata on behalf of Schindler of Puerto Rico LLC Responses due by 9/6/2019. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Related document(s) #1 ) (Grovas-Porrata, Carlos) |
| Filing 6 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding Notification of Writen Discovery filed by Carlos J. Grovas-Porrata on behalf of Schindler of Puerto Rico LLC Responses due by 8/9/2019. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Grovas-Porrata, Carlos) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Complaint or Otherwise Plead re: #1 Complaint, filed by Raquel Gonzalez-Rosario filed by Carlos J. Grovas-Porrata on behalf of Schindler of Puerto Rico LLC Responses due by 8/7/2019. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Related document(s) #1 ) (Grovas-Porrata, Carlos) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Raquel Gonzalez-Rosario upon Schindler of Puerto Rico LLC served on 7/3/2019, answer due 7/24/2019. (Cancio-Valdivia, Jorge) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Schindler of Puerto Rico LLC (Attachments: #1 Summons) (arg) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT Case has been assigned to Judge William G. Young (arg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Schindler of Puerto Rico LLC D/B/A Shindler Elevator or Schindler Elevators and Escalators ( Filing fee $400 receipt number 0104-6477309.), filed by Raquel Gonzalez-Rosario. Service due by 9/27/2019, (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Sheet, #3 Summons)(Cancio-Valdivia, Jorge) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gonzalez-Rosario v. Schindler of Puerto Rico LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Raquel Gonzalez-Rosario | |
| Represented By: | Jorge L. Cancio-Valdivia |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Schindler of Puerto Rico LLC | |
| Represented By: | Carlos J. Grovas-Porrata |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
