Municipality of Caguas v. Purdue Pharma Inc. et al
MUNICIPALITY OF CAGUAS, PUERTO RICO and Municipality of Caguas |
McKESSON CORPORATION, RICHARD S. SACKLER, ANDA, INC., PURDUE PHARMA L.P., MALLINCKRODT LLC, PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC., BEVERLY SACKLER, MALLINCKRODT PLC, INSYS THERAPEUTICS, INC., ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC. f/k/a WATSON PHARMA, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., THERESA SACKLER, ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ORTHO-McNEIL-JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. N/K/A JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., RHODES TECHNOLOGIES, CARDINAL HEALTH, INC., DAVID A. SACKLER, STUART D. BAKER, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA, INC. N/K/A JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., THE PURDUE FREDERICK COMPANY, INC., ALLERGAN PLC f/k/a ACTAVIS PLC, CEPHALON, INC., ACTAVIS, LLC, PURDUE PHARMA INC, MORTIMER D.A. SACKLER, MIAMI-LUKEN, INC., ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, THE P.F. LABORATORIES, INC., H.D. SMITH WHOLESALE DRUG COMPANY, WATSON LABORATORIES, INC., ILENE SACKLER LEFCOURT, AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION, OTHER CORPORATIONS ABC AND 1-100, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., RHODES TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RHODES PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., KATHE A. SACKLER, SPECGX LLC, JONATHAN D. SACKLER, NORAMCO, INC., TRUST FOR THE BENEFIT OF MEMBERS OF THE RAYMOND SACKLER FAMILY, ALLERGEN FINANCE, LLC f/k/a ACTAVIS, Inc. f/k/a WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., RHODES PHARMACEUTICALS L.P., PAR PHARMACEUTICALS COMPANIES, INC., Allergen Finance, LLC, Purdue Pharma, Inc., Allergan PLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., Ilene Sackler-Lefcourt, Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Rhodes Pharmaceutical L.P. and Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc. |
3:2019cv01814 |
August 29, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
Francisco A Besosa |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Case transferred from Puerto Rico has been opened in Northern District of Ohio as case 1:19-op-45814, filed 09/25/2019. (ab) |
Filing 8 CERTIFIED COPY OF CTO-111 received from the Northern District of Ohio. (ab) |
Filing 7 Minute Order to involved Clerks entered in MDL #2804 informing of the electronic transfer to the Northern District of Ohio. Order becomes effective upon receipt of a certified copy of CTO-111 from the transferee court. Signed by Clerk of the Multidistrict Litigation Panel John W. Nichols on 9/19/2019. (ab) Modified on 9/19/2019 to correct cto #(ab). |
Filing 6 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER FINALIZED (CTO-111) for the transfer of this case to N.D. of Ohio. Signed by Clerk of the Panel John W. Nichols on 9/19/2019. (Attachments: #1 Tag Along Actions, #2 NEF) (ab) |
Case transferred out to the Northern District of Ohio through the extract civil case utility, sending e-mail to InterdistrictTransfer_OHND@ohnd.uscourts.gov (ab) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION, Actavis Pharma, Inc., Actavis, LLC, Allergan PLC, Allergen Finance, LLC, Anda, Inc., CARDINAL HEALTH, INC., CEPHALON, INC., ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC., ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., H.D. Smith Wholesale Drug Company, Insys Therapeutics, Inc., JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc., MALLINCKRODT LLC, MALLINCKRODT PLC, McKESSON CORPORATION, Miami-Luken, Inc., NORAMCO, INC., Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., PAR Pharmaceutical, Inc., PURDUE PHARMA L.P., Purdue Pharma, Inc., Rhodes Pharmaceutical L.P., Rhodes Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Rhodes Technologies, Rhodes Technologies, Inc., Beverly Sackler, David A. Sackler, Jonathan D. Sackler, Kathe A. Sackler, Mortimer D.A. Sackler, Richard S. Sackler, Theresa Sackler, Ilene Sackler-Lefcourt, Specgx LLC, Stuart D. Baker, TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., THE PURDUE FREDERICK COMPANY, INC., The P.F. Laboratories, Inc., Trust for the Benefit of Members of the Raymond Sackler Family, WATSON LABORATORIES, INC. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (arg) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM OF THE CLERK: Pursuant to the Order of Recusal entered by Judge Daniel R. Dominguez (Docket 3), this case has been randomly reassigned within the Case Assignment System to Judge Francisco A. Besosa. Judge Daniel R. Dominguez is no longer assigned to this case. Signed by Clerk on 08/30/2019. (ft) |
Filing 3 ORDER OF RECUSAL. The undersigned hereby disqualifies himself from presiding over this matter. The case shall randomly be reassigned immediately to another Article III judge. Signed by Judge Daniel R. Dominguez on 8/30/2019. (EA) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT Case has been assigned to Judge Daniel R. Dominguez (arg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $400 receipt number 0104-6564927.), filed by Municipality of Caguas, Puerto Rico. Service due by 11/27/2019, (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Sheet, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Summons, #10 Summons, #11 Summons, #12 Summons, #13 Summons, #14 Summons, #15 Summons, #16 Summons, #17 Summons, #18 Summons, #19 Summons, #20 Summons, #21 Summons, #22 Summons, #23 Summons, #24 Summons, #25 Summons, #26 Summons, #27 Summons, #28 Summons, #29 Summons, #30 Summons, #31 Summons, #32 Summons, #33 Summons, #34 Summons, #35 Summons, #36 Summons, #37 Summons, #38 Summons, #39 Summons, #40 Summons, #41 Summons, #42 Summons, #43 Summons, #44 Summons, #45 Summons)(Sanders, Douglas) Modified on 9/3/2019 to edit docket text (ab). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.